MMR Group Inc et al v. Solar Millennium, LLC

Filing 132

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 131 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Palo Verde Solar I, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 1, LLC, Solar Trust of America, LLC, STA Dev elopment LLC, CA I-10 Solar, LLC, Solar Millenium, Inc., Palo Verde Solar II, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 2, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 3, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 4, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Jerry L. Marks (SBN 135395)
Email: [e-mail]
Aaron Renenger (SBN 222675)
Email: [e-mail]
MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP
601 S. Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
David R. Gelfand (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Rachel Penski Fissell (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP
1 Chase Manhattan Plaza
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants STA Development, LLC,
Solar Trust of America, LLC, Solar Millennium, Inc.,
CA I-10 Solar, LLC, Palo Verde Solar I, LLC,
Palo Verde Solar II, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project
Unit 1, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 2, LLC,
Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 3, LLC and
Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 4, LLC

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
MMR GROUP, INC.,
MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and
SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
STA DEVELOPMENT, LLC (F/K/A SOLAR
MILLENNIUM, LLC), SOLAR TRUST OF
AMERICA, LLC, SOLAR MILLENNIUM AG,
SOLAR MILLENNIUM, INC., CA I-10 SOLAR, LLC,
PALO VERDE SOLAR I, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR
II, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 1,
LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 2,
LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 3, LLC
AND BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 4, LLC
Defendants.

Case No. 3:11-cv-01521-EMC
ELEVENTH STIPULATION
TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
The Honorable Judge
Edward M. Chen

ELEVENTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

Plaintiffs MMR GROUP, INC., MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and
SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC (collectively, “MMR”) and Defendants STA
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SOLAR TRUST OF AMERICA, LLC, SOLAR MILLENNIUM, INC.,

4
CA I-10 SOLAR, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR I, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR II, LLC,
5
6

BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 1, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT

7

UNIT 2, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 3, LLC AND BLYTHE SOLAR

8

POWER PROJECT UNIT 4, LLC (collectively, the “STAD Defendants”) respectfully request

9

that the Court extend the time for the STAD Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint,

10
11
12
13

filed on October 4, 2011 (ECF No. 102) and served on the STAD Defendants on October 7, 2011,
by two weeks from March 6, 2012 to March 13, 2012.
On November 4th and 14th, the parties requested, and this Court later granted, a one-week

14

extension of time for the STAD Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint because the

15

parties were in advanced stages of settlement discussions. On November 22nd, December 1st, and

16

December 27th, January 10th, January 20th, February 3rd, and February 21st, the parties requested,

17

and this Court later granted, extensions of two weeks due to continued progress in settlement

18

negotiations. The parties continue to be hopeful that they will execute a settlement agreement

19
forthwith. Due to the continued progress in reaching a settlement, the parties request a one-week
20
21

extension of the time for the STAD Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint. The

22

parties’ request will have a de minimis, if any, impact on the schedule. In the interests of judicial

23

economy, the parties therefore request that the Court extend the STAD Defendants’ time to

24

respond to the Amended Complaint by two weeks from March 6, 2012 to March 13, 2012.

25
26
27
28
-2-

ELEVENTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Dated: March 5, 2012

2

By: /s/ _________________________
Jerry L. Marks (SBN 135395)
Aaron Renenger (SBN 222675)
601 S. Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6

David R. Gelfand (admitted pro hac vice)
Rachel Penski Fissell (admitted pro hac vice)
1 Chase Manhattan Plaza
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendants STA Development, LLC,
Solar Trust of America, LLC, Solar Millennium, Inc.,
CA I-10 Solar, LLC, Palo Verde Solar I, LLC,
Palo Verde Solar II, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project
Unit 1, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 2, LLC,
Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 3, LLC and Blythe Solar
Power Project Unit 4, LLC

11
12
13
14
15

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP

Dated: March 5, 2012

16

WATT, TIEDER, HOFFAR & FITZGERALD, LLP
By: /s/ _______________________________________
Bennett J. Lee (CA Bar No. 230482)
Nicholas A. Merrell (CA Bar No. 240795)
Regina A. Verducci (CA Bar No. 264996)
333 Bush Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-623-7001

17
18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MMR Group, Inc., MMR Power
Solutions, LLC and Southwestern Power Group II, LLC

23

S

3/6/12
Dated: ______________________

26

O OR
IT IS S
dw
Judge E

DERE

27

H

ER

Chen

LI

RT

-3-

ard M.

A

28

R NIA

UNIT
ED

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D

NO

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FO

22

C
OF
DTIME TO RESPOND TO
ELEVENTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ I S T R I C T
N

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER