MMR Group Inc et al v. Solar Millennium, LLC
Filing
140
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Stipulation of Dismissal) filed by Southwestern Power Group II, LLC, MMR Power Solutions, LLC, MMR Group Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
Rodi Frank Rispone (CA Bar No. 169062)
Attorney at Law
15961 Airline highway
Baton Rouge, LA 70817
Tel.: 225-756-5090
Fax: 225-753-7012
Email: rrispone@mmrgrp.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Bennett J. Lee (CA Bar No. 230482)
Nicholas A. Merrell (CA Bar No. 240795)
Regina A. Verducci (CA Bar No. 264996)
WATT, TIEDER, HOFFAR & FITZGERALD, L.L.P.
333 Bush Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: 415-623-7000
Fax: 415-623-7001
Email: blee@wthf.com; nmerrell@wthf.com; rveducc@wthf.com
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MMR GROUP, INC.,
MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and SOUTHWESTERN
POWER GROUP II, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MMR GROUP, INC.,
MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and
SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 3:11-cv-01521-EMC
STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL; PROPOSED
ORDER
vs.
STA DEVELOPMENT, LLC (F/K/A SOLAR
MILLENNIUM, LLC), SOLAR TRUST OF
AMERICA, LLC, SOLAR MILLENNIUM AG,
SOLAR MILLENNIUM, INC., CA I-10 SOLAR, LLC,
PALO VERDE SOLAR I, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR
II, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 1,
LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 2,
LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 3, LLC
AND BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 4, LLC
Defendants
The Honorable Judge
Edward M. Chen
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER
1
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of a global
2
settlement agreement, Plaintiffs MMR GROUP, INC., MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and
3
SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC, and Defendants STA DEVELOPMENT, LLC
4
(“STAD”), SOLAR TRUST OF AMERICA, LLC, SOLAR MILLENNIUM, INC., CA I-10
5
SOLAR, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR I, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR II, LLC, BLYTHE
6
SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 1, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 2,
7
LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 3, LLC AND BLYTHE SOLAR POWER
8
PROJECT UNIT 4, LLC, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this entire action with prejudice,
9
each party to bear its own costs and fees, and respectfully request that the court dismiss the action
10
accordingly.
11
12
Dated: June 6, 2012
K&L Gates LLP
By: /s/ Michael R. Haven
Michael R. Haven (SBN 208721)
630 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 798-6700
Facsimile: (650) 798-6701
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants STA Development, LLC,
Solar Trust of America, LLC, Solar Millennium, Inc.,
CA I-10 Solar, LLC, Palo Verde Solar I, LLC,
Palo Verde Solar II, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project
Unit 1, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 2, LLC,
Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 3, LLC and Blythe Solar
Power Project Unit 4, LLC
17
18
19
20
21
Dated: June 6, 2012
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WATT, TIEDER, HOFFAR & FITZGERALD, LLP
By: /s/ Nicholas A. Merrell
Bennett J. Lee (CA Bar No. 230482)
Nicholas A. Merrell (CA Bar No. 240795)
333 Bush Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-623-7000
Facsimile: 415-623-7001
Attorneys for Plaintiffs MMR Group, Inc., MMR Power
Solutions, LLC and Southwestern Power Group II, LLC
-2-
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
For good cause shown and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED:
4
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to
bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
S
Dated:
June 11, 2012
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ERED
O ORD
SSTATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED
IT IS
10
ER
LI
dwa
Judge E
A
H
13
RT
12
hen
rd M. C
NO
11
R NIA
6
FO
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?