MMR Group Inc et al v. Solar Millennium, LLC

Filing 140

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Stipulation of Dismissal) filed by Southwestern Power Group II, LLC, MMR Power Solutions, LLC, MMR Group Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Rodi Frank Rispone (CA Bar No. 169062) Attorney at Law 15961 Airline highway Baton Rouge, LA 70817 Tel.: 225-756-5090 Fax: 225-753-7012 Email: rrispone@mmrgrp.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 Bennett J. Lee (CA Bar No. 230482) Nicholas A. Merrell (CA Bar No. 240795) Regina A. Verducci (CA Bar No. 264996) WATT, TIEDER, HOFFAR & FITZGERALD, L.L.P. 333 Bush Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: 415-623-7000 Fax: 415-623-7001 Email: blee@wthf.com; nmerrell@wthf.com; rveducc@wthf.com 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MMR GROUP, INC., MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MMR GROUP, INC., MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC, Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:11-cv-01521-EMC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER vs. STA DEVELOPMENT, LLC (F/K/A SOLAR MILLENNIUM, LLC), SOLAR TRUST OF AMERICA, LLC, SOLAR MILLENNIUM AG, SOLAR MILLENNIUM, INC., CA I-10 SOLAR, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR I, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR II, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 1, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 2, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 3, LLC AND BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 4, LLC Defendants The Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER 1 Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of a global 2 settlement agreement, Plaintiffs MMR GROUP, INC., MMR POWER SOLUTIONS, LLC and 3 SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC, and Defendants STA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 4 (“STAD”), SOLAR TRUST OF AMERICA, LLC, SOLAR MILLENNIUM, INC., CA I-10 5 SOLAR, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR I, LLC, PALO VERDE SOLAR II, LLC, BLYTHE 6 SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 1, LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 2, 7 LLC, BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT UNIT 3, LLC AND BLYTHE SOLAR POWER 8 PROJECT UNIT 4, LLC, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this entire action with prejudice, 9 each party to bear its own costs and fees, and respectfully request that the court dismiss the action 10 accordingly. 11 12 Dated: June 6, 2012 K&L Gates LLP By: /s/ Michael R. Haven Michael R. Haven (SBN 208721) 630 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 798-6700 Facsimile: (650) 798-6701 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendants STA Development, LLC, Solar Trust of America, LLC, Solar Millennium, Inc., CA I-10 Solar, LLC, Palo Verde Solar I, LLC, Palo Verde Solar II, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 1, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 2, LLC, Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 3, LLC and Blythe Solar Power Project Unit 4, LLC 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: June 6, 2012 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WATT, TIEDER, HOFFAR & FITZGERALD, LLP By: /s/ Nicholas A. Merrell Bennett J. Lee (CA Bar No. 230482) Nicholas A. Merrell (CA Bar No. 240795) 333 Bush Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-623-7000 Facsimile: 415-623-7001 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MMR Group, Inc., MMR Power Solutions, LLC and Southwestern Power Group II, LLC -2- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 For good cause shown and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 S Dated: June 11, 2012 UNIT ED 8 RT U O 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA ERED O ORD SSTATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNITED IT IS 10 ER LI dwa Judge E A H 13 RT 12 hen rd M. C NO 11 R NIA 6 FO 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?