Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 121

ORDER re 119 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to File Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and to File Overlength Memorandum filed by Robin Antonick, Reset Deadlines re 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Responses due by 6/6/2012, not to exceed thirty pages of text. Replies due by 6/15/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/1/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2012)

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document119 Filed05/30/12 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice)
Leonard W. Aragon (Pro Hac Vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Stuart M. Paynter (226147)
Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice)
THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen,

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
005004-11 523792 V1
668667.01

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:11-cv-01543-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO
FILE OVERLENGTH MEMORANDUM
Date Complaint Filed: March 30, 2011
Trial Date:
Not Assigned

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document119 Filed05/30/12 Page2 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

WHEREAS, Defendant agreed to an extension for Plaintiff to file his opposition to
Defendant Electronic Arts Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, from the current due date of May
31, 2012, to June 6, 2012. Defendant likewise agreed for Plaintiff to file memorandum in support
of his opposition which exceeds the page limitations of Civil L.R. 7-4(b), with an additional five
pages. Both parties agreed that these changes to the briefing schedule do not affect the June 29,
2012 hearing date, which is still proper pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2(a).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and the
Defendant, as follows:
• The deadline for Plaintiff to file his response in opposition to the Motion for Summary
Judgment is extended to June 6, 2012. Plaintiff’s memorandum in support of his opposition
shall not exceed thirty pages of text.
• The deadline for Defendant to file its reply in further support of the Motion for Summary
Judgment is extended to June 15, 2012.
• These extensions do not affect the previously-noticed June 29, 2012 hearing date for the
Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

18
19

DATED: May 30, 2012

20

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By

21

Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice)
11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/ Leonard W. Aragon
LEONARD W. ARAGON (Pro Hac Vice)

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO
FILE OVERLENGTH MEMO. – No. 3:11-cv-01543-CRB
005004-11 523792 V1
668667.01

-1-

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document119 Filed05/30/12 Page3 of 4

1

DATED: May 30, 2012

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

2

By

/s/ R. Adam Lauridsen
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN (243780)

3
Susan J. Harriman (111703)
Tia A. Sherringham (258507)
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

I, Leonard W. Aragon, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby
attest that R. Adam Lauridsen has concurred in this filing.

13
*

IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 1, 2012

18
19

HONORABLE CHARLES EDBREYER
R.
RDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
IS SO O
IT

RT

21

har
Judge C

ER

23
24
25
26
27
28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND TO FILE OVERLENGTH MEMO. – No. 3:11-cv01543-CRB 523792 V1
005004-11

A

H

22

reyer

les R. B

NO

20

R NIA

DATED:

UNIT
ED

17

RT
U
O

S

16

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

15

*

LI

*

14

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C