Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 209

ORDER granting 201 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION filed by Electronic Arts, Inc. Reset Deadlines as to 194 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/2/2012. Replies due by 11/12/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/25/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document201 Filed10/24/12 Page1 of 4 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP SUSAN J. HARRIMAN, #111703 R. ADAM LAURIDSEN, #243780 TIA A. SHERRINGHAM, #258507 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 (415) 391-5400 Telephone: Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois citizen, Plaintiff, V. Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California corporation, Defendant. Date Comp. Filed: March 30, 2011 Trial Date: April 1, 2013 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB 702599.01 Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document201 Filed10/24/12 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA") filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on October 5, 2012, setting it for hearing on November 9, 2012; WHEREAS EA filed the declaration of William Kaiser in support of its summary judgment motion; 5 WHEREAS Plaintiff noticed Mr. Kaiser's deposition for October 22, 2012; 6 WHEREAS due to a death in Mr. Kaiser's family, his deposition was continued to 7 8 October 31, 2012; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff 9 and EA, that Plaintiff s opposition to the summary judgment motion is now due on November 2, 10 2012 and EA' s reply is now due on November 12, 2012. The parties request that the hearing on 11 the summary judgment motion be moved from November 9, 2012 to the first available hearing 12 date of December 14 , 2012 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. 13 14 DATED: October 24, 2012 THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC 15 By: /s/ Stuart M Paynter STUART M. PAYNTER 16 17 18 DATED: October 24, 2012 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 19 20 21 By: /s/ Susan J. Harriman SUSAN J:HARRIMAN 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION CASE NO. 3 : 11-CV-01543-CRB 702599.01 Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document201 Filed10/24/12 Page3 of 4 I, Susan J. Harriman, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Stuart M. Paynter has concurred in this filing. ORDER UNIT ED HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER ERED UNITED STATES D O OR DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IS S R NIA IT yer RT A H ER FO NO s R. Bre harle Judge C LI DATED: October 25 , 2012 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S IT IS SO ORDERED. N F D IS T IC T O R C 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION CASE NO. 3 :11-CV-01543-CRB 702599.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?