Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 209

ORDER granting 201 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION filed by Electronic Arts, Inc. Reset Deadlines as to 194 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/2/2012. Replies due by 11/12/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/25/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012)

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document201 Filed10/24/12 Page1 of 4

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN, #111703
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN, #243780
TIA A. SHERRINGHAM, #258507
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
[phone]
Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois citizen,
Plaintiff,
V.

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.

Date Comp. Filed:
March 30, 2011
Trial Date:
April 1, 2013

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB
702599.01

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document201 Filed10/24/12 Page2 of 4

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA") filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on
October 5, 2012, setting it for hearing on November 9, 2012;
WHEREAS EA filed the declaration of William Kaiser in support of its summary
judgment motion;

5

WHEREAS Plaintiff noticed Mr. Kaiser's deposition for October 22, 2012;

6

WHEREAS due to a death in Mr. Kaiser's family, his deposition was continued to

7
8

October 31, 2012;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff

9

and EA, that Plaintiff s opposition to the summary judgment motion is now due on November 2,

10

2012 and EA' s reply is now due on November 12, 2012. The parties request that the hearing on

11

the summary judgment motion be moved from November 9, 2012 to the first available hearing

12

date of December 14 , 2012 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.

13
14

DATED: October 24, 2012

THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC

15
By: /s/ Stuart M Paynter
STUART M. PAYNTER

16
17
18

DATED: October 24, 2012

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

19
20
21

By: /s/ Susan J. Harriman
SUSAN J:HARRIMAN

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
CASE NO. 3 : 11-CV-01543-CRB
702599.01

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document201 Filed10/24/12 Page3 of 4

I, Susan J. Harriman, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. In
compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Stuart M. Paynter has concurred in
this filing.

ORDER

UNIT
ED

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
ERED
UNITED STATES D
O OR DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
IS S

R NIA

IT

yer

RT

A

H

ER

FO

NO

s R. Bre

harle
Judge C

LI

DATED: October 25 , 2012

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
CASE NO. 3 :11-CV-01543-CRB
702599.01