Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 221

ORDER granting 216 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Summary Judgment Motion filed by Robin Antonick. Reset Deadlines as to 194 MOTION for Summary Judgment ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Responses due by 11/21/2012. Replies due by 12/5/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/6/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document216 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC
Stuart M. Paynter (226147)
Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice)
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

10

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice)
Leonard W. Aragon (Pro Hac Vice)
11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick

7
8
9

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION

v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.

Judge:
Charles R. Breyer
Date Comp. Filed: March 30, 2011
Trial Date:
April 1, 2013

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document216 Filed11/02/12 Page2 of 3

1
2

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to an extended briefing schedule for Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment which was entered by the Court on October 25, 2012;

3

WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulation Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s motion for

4

summary judgment is due November 2, 2012, and EA’s reply in support of its motion for summary

5

judgment is due November 12, 2012, with the hearing on the motion to be held December 14,

6

2012;

7
8

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to the current schedule due to the deposition of William
Kaiser being continued to October 31, 2012, because of a death in his family;

9

WHEREAS, William Kaiser’s deposition must be continued a second time because

10

Hurricane Sandy prevented Mr. Kaiser from attending his deposition and Mr. Kaiser is still without

11

electricity;

12

WHEREAS, the parties nonetheless stipulate that Mr. Kaiser’s deposition will take place on

13

November 19, 2012, and that Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is

14

due on November 21, 2012 and Defendant’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment

15

is due on December 5, 2012. The motion will still be heard on December 14, 2012;

16

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff

17

and Defendant, that Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment is now due on

18

November 21, 2012 and Defendant’s reply is now due on December 5, 2012.

19
20

The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained
from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).

21
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

DATED: November 2, 2012
22
23

By /s/ Leonard W. Aragon
LEONARD W. ARAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick

24
25

DATED: November 2, 2012

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

26
By /s/ Susan Harriman
SUSAN HARRIMAN
Attorneys for Defendant Electronic Arts

27
28
1
STIULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document216 Filed11/02/12 Page3 of 3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 6
DATED: _______________, 2012

UNIT
ED

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
ERED
UNITED STATES IS SO ORD
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

IT

RT

7

harle
Judge C

ER

H

8
9

yer

s R. Bre

NO

6

R NIA

5

FO

4

LI

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

2

A

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB