Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 259

ORDER granting 248 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Defendant's Time To File Reply In Support Of Its Motion To Strike The Declaration Of Jennifer L. Murray filed by Electronic Arts, Inc.,, 246 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Extensions of Time filed by Robin Antonick. Replies re mtn to strike due by 1/2/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/3/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document248 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN - #111703
[e-mail]
ERIC H. MACMICHAEL - # 231697
[e-mail]
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780
[e-mail]
TIA A. SHERRINGHAM - #258507
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois citizen,

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)

13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California
corporation,

17

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO
FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF
JENNIFER L. MURRAY

18

Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:

January 25, 2013
10:00 a.m.
6, 17th Floor
Hon. Charles R. Breyer

19

Complaint Filed:

20

Trial Date: April 1, 2013

March 30, 2011

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. MURRAY
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
717576.01

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document248 Filed12/21/12 Page2 of 3

1

WHEREAS, on December 5, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion to Strike the Declaration of

2

Jennifer L. Murray in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Second Motion for

3

Summary Judgment;

4

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2012, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion;

5

WHEREAS, Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion is due on December 26, 2012;

6

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a seven-day extension for Defendant to file its

7

Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer L. Murray extending the due

8

date to January 2, 2013. The extension will not change the January 25, 2013 hearing date for the

9

motion;

10
11
12

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff
and Defendant, that:
•

Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer L.

13

Murray in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Second Motion for

14

Summary Judgment is due January 2, 2013; and,

15
16
17

•

The hearing will remain as scheduled.

The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained
from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).

18
19

Dated: December 21, 2012

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO
LLP

20
By:

21
22
23

Dated: December 21, 2012

/s/ Leonard W. Aragon
LEONARD W. ARAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBIN ANTONICK
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

24
25

By:

26
27

/s/ Susan J. Harriman
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. MURRAY
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
717576.01

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document248 Filed12/21/12 Page3 of 3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

S

R NIA

________________________________________
HON. CHARLES R.ERED
BREYER
UNITED STATESD
SO OR DISTRICT COURT
IT IS
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
. Breyer
harles R
Judge C

NO

6

, 2012

RT

7

FO

5

January 3, 2013

UNIT
ED

4

DATED:

RT
U
O

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

8
9

A

H

ER

LI

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. MURRAY
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
717576.01