Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,
Filing
308
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 304 Motion to Strike. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
ROBIN ANTONICK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. C 11-01543 CRB
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STRIKE DOCKET NO. 300
v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Strike Docket No. 300 (dkt. 304) is DENIED, as
18
the Court does not find Defendant’s Motion to Strike (dkt. 300) to be an improper in limine
19
motion. Defendant’s Motion to Strike will be heard on the same date as Defendant’s third
20
Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. 290).
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: February 12, 2013
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2011\1543\order re mot to strike.wpd
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?