Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 308

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 304 Motion to Strike. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

ROBIN ANTONICK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. C 11-01543 CRB
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STRIKE DOCKET NO. 300

v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC,
Defendant.

/

16
17

Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Strike Docket No. 300 (dkt. 304) is DENIED, as

18

the Court does not find Defendant’s Motion to Strike (dkt. 300) to be an improper in limine

19

motion. Defendant’s Motion to Strike will be heard on the same date as Defendant’s third

20

Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. 290).

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated: February 12, 2013

24
25
26
27
28

G:\CRBALL\2011\1543\order re mot to strike.wpd

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE