Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,
Filing
310
ORDER granting 302 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Summary Judgment Motion, Pretrial Conference and Trial filed by Robin Antonick. Reset Deadlines as to 290 Third MOTION for Summary Judgment ., Responses due by 2/19/2013. Replies due by 3/4/2013. Motion Hearing set for 3/22/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Jury Selection/Trial set for 4/1/2013 at 9:00 a.m.. Pretrial Conference set for 3/26/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/12/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)
Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document302 Filed02/04/13 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC
Stuart M. Paynter (226147)
Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice)
Sara Willingham (Pro Hac Vice)
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 626-4486
Facsimile: (866) 734-0622
Email: stuart@smplegal.com
jmurray@smplegal.com
swillingham@paynterlawfirm.com
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice)
Leonard W. Aragon (Pro Hac Vice)
11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone: (602) 840-5900
Facsimile: (602) 840-3012
Email: rob@hbsslaw.com
leonard@hbsslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen,
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
21
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
726549.01
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION, PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE AND TRIAL
Judge:
Charles R. Breyer
Date Comp. Filed: March 30, 2011
Trial Date:
April 1, 2013
Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document302 Filed02/04/13 Page2 of 3
1
2
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2013, Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) filed a Third
Motion for Summary Judgment, which is set for hearing on March 8, 2013;
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests a seven-day (7) extension to file his opposition to EA’s
4
Third Motion for Summary Judgment, from the current due date of February 12, 2013, to February
5
19, 2013;
6
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiff also has asked to exceed the page limitation of Civil L.R. 7-4(b) by
an additional five pages; and
8
9
WHEREAS, trial in this matter is set for April 1, 2013 and no Final Pretrial Conference is
yet scheduled.
10
11
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff
and Defendant, as follows:
12
13
Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment is now due February 19,
2013. Plaintiff’s memorandum shall not exceed 30 pages of text;
14
Defendant’s reply is now due on March 4, 2013;
15
The Court may set a hearing date for the Third Summary Judgment motion on any
16
date after March 4, 2013, that works on its calendar;
17
EA proposes that the Court continue the trial date to April 29, 2013, and set the
18
Final Pretrial Conference on April 18, 2013 at 2:30 p.m., so that the parties may
19
know the Court’s ruling on its summary judgment motion before filing their motions
20
in limine and the joint proposed final pretrial order.
21
Antonick requests that the Court maintain the trial date of April 1, 2013, and set the
22
Final Pretrial Conference for March 26, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. If the Court continues the
23
trial, however, Plaintiff respectfully requests that his opposition to the motion for
24
summary judgment be due on February 26, 2013 and the reply be due on March 12,
25
2013.
26
///
27
///
28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB
Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document302 Filed02/04/13 Page3 of 3
1
2
The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained
from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).
3
4
DATED: February 4, 2013
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
5
By /s/ Leonard W. Aragon
LEONARD W. ARAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick
6
7
DATED: February 4, 2013
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
8
By /s/ Susan Harriman
SUSAN HARRIMAN
Attorneys for Defendant Electronic Arts
9
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
13
Feb.
Plaintiff’s opposition to EA’s Third Motion for Summary Judgment is due on ____.19, 2013
14
Plaintiff’s memorandum shall not exceed 30 pages of text. Defendant’s reply in support of its Third
15
Motion for Summary Judgment is due on_____. 4, 2013.
March
16
22
The hearing date for EA’s Third Summary Judgment Motion shall be March __, 2013 at
17
10:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference date shall be ________________, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The
March 26
18
1
trial shall begin on April __, 2013.at 9:00 a.m.
UNIT
ED
February 12
DATED: _______________, 2013
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
RT
24
harle
Judge C
ER
H
25
26
yer
s R. Bre
NO
23
O
FO
22
O
IT IS S
LI
21
R NIA
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
RDERE
A
20
S
19
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?