Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 310

ORDER granting 302 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Summary Judgment Motion, Pretrial Conference and Trial filed by Robin Antonick. Reset Deadlines as to 290 Third MOTION for Summary Judgment ., Responses due by 2/19/2013. Replies due by 3/4/2013. Motion Hearing set for 3/22/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Jury Selection/Trial set for 4/1/2013 at 9:00 a.m.. Pretrial Conference set for 3/26/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/12/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document302 Filed02/04/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC Stuart M. Paynter (226147) Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice) Sara Willingham (Pro Hac Vice) 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 626-4486 Facsimile: (866) 734-0622 Email: stuart@smplegal.com jmurray@smplegal.com swillingham@paynterlawfirm.com HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice) Leonard W. Aragon (Pro Hac Vice) 11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Telephone: (602) 840-5900 Facsimile: (602) 840-3012 Email: rob@hbsslaw.com leonard@hbsslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen, Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 21 Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California corporation, Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 726549.01 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL Judge: Charles R. Breyer Date Comp. Filed: March 30, 2011 Trial Date: April 1, 2013 Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document302 Filed02/04/13 Page2 of 3 1 2 WHEREAS, on January 29, 2013, Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) filed a Third Motion for Summary Judgment, which is set for hearing on March 8, 2013; 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests a seven-day (7) extension to file his opposition to EA’s 4 Third Motion for Summary Judgment, from the current due date of February 12, 2013, to February 5 19, 2013; 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiff also has asked to exceed the page limitation of Civil L.R. 7-4(b) by an additional five pages; and 8 9 WHEREAS, trial in this matter is set for April 1, 2013 and no Final Pretrial Conference is yet scheduled. 10 11 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, as follows:  12 13 Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment is now due February 19, 2013. Plaintiff’s memorandum shall not exceed 30 pages of text; 14  Defendant’s reply is now due on March 4, 2013; 15  The Court may set a hearing date for the Third Summary Judgment motion on any 16 date after March 4, 2013, that works on its calendar;  17 EA proposes that the Court continue the trial date to April 29, 2013, and set the 18 Final Pretrial Conference on April 18, 2013 at 2:30 p.m., so that the parties may 19 know the Court’s ruling on its summary judgment motion before filing their motions 20 in limine and the joint proposed final pretrial order.  21 Antonick requests that the Court maintain the trial date of April 1, 2013, and set the 22 Final Pretrial Conference for March 26, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. If the Court continues the 23 trial, however, Plaintiff respectfully requests that his opposition to the motion for 24 summary judgment be due on February 26, 2013 and the reply be due on March 12, 25 2013. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document302 Filed02/04/13 Page3 of 3 1 2 The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). 3 4 DATED: February 4, 2013 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 5 By /s/ Leonard W. Aragon LEONARD W. ARAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick 6 7 DATED: February 4, 2013 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 8 By /s/ Susan Harriman SUSAN HARRIMAN Attorneys for Defendant Electronic Arts 9 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 13 Feb. Plaintiff’s opposition to EA’s Third Motion for Summary Judgment is due on ____.19, 2013 14 Plaintiff’s memorandum shall not exceed 30 pages of text. Defendant’s reply in support of its Third 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is due on_____. 4, 2013. March 16 22 The hearing date for EA’s Third Summary Judgment Motion shall be March __, 2013 at 17 10:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference date shall be ________________, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The March 26 18 1 trial shall begin on April __, 2013.at 9:00 a.m. UNIT ED February 12 DATED: _______________, 2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O RT 24 harle Judge C ER H 25 26 yer s R. Bre NO 23 O FO 22 O IT IS S LI 21 R NIA HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RDERE A 20 S 19 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?