Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 327

ORDER granting 311 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Plaintiff to File Opposition and Defendant to File Reply to Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen filed by Robin Antonick.Reset Deadlines as to 300 MOTION to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen. Responses due by 2/26/2013. Replies due by 3/11/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/21/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC Stuart M. Paynter (226147) Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice) Sara Willingham (Pro Hac Vice) 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 626-4486 Facsimile: (866) 734-0622 Email: stuart@smplegal.com jmurray@smplegal.com swillingham@paynterlawfirm.com 11 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice) Leonard W. Aragon (Pro Hac Vice) 11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Telephone: (602) 840-5900 Facsimile: (602) 840-3012 Email: rob@hbsslaw.com leonard@hbsslaw.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick 7 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen, Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California corporation, 20 Defendant. STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY TO MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF EXPERT REPORT BY GARRY KITCHEN 21 Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: 23 March 22, 2013 10:00 a.m. 6, 17th Floor Charles R. Breyer Date Filed: Trial Date: 22 March 30, 2011 April 1, 2013 24 25 26 27 28 726549.01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen on February 1, 2013; WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen is due February 15, 2013; WHEREAS, Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen is due February 22, 2013; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to an extension of the current schedule so that 8 Plaintiff’s Opposition is now due on February 26, 2013, and Defendant’s Reply is now due on 9 March 11, 2013. The extension will not change the March 22, 2013 hearing date for the motion; 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, as follows: • Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen is now due February 26, 2013; • Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report by Garry Kitchen is due March 11, 2013; • The hearing will remain as scheduled. The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained 17 from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). 18 DATED: February 14, 2013 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 19 By /s/ Leonard W. Aragon LEONARD W. ARAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick 20 21 DATED: February 14, 2013 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 22 By /s/ Susan Harriman SUSAN HARRIMAN Attorneys for Defendant Electronic Arts 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: O ORD IT IS S ERED Judge C LI RT 1 FO HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICTleCOURT JUDGE . Breyer har s R NO 28 DATED: February 21, 2013 H ER STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANT TO FILE C N REPLY TO MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF EXPERT REPORT BY GARRY KITCHEN Case F 3:11-CV-01543-CRB O No. D A 27 UNIT ED 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 25 R NIA 23 IS T RIC T

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?