Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 351

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer re April 22, 2013 Submissions. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

ROBIN ANTONICK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. C 11-01543 CRB
ORDER RE APRIL 22, 2013
SUBMISSIONS

v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC,
Defendant.

/

16
17

Yesterday the Court received: a letter from Plaintiff’s counsel (dkt. 348); an

18

Administrative Motion from Plaintiff’s counsel, which seeks to file under seal an exhibit to

19

Plaintiff’s counsel’s letter (dkt. 349); and a letter from Defendant’s counsel, objecting to

20

Plaintiff’s counsel’s letter (dkt. 350). The Court finds Plaintiff’s counsel’s letter improper,

21

and will not consider it. See Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) (“Once a reply is filed, no additional

22

memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval . . .”). Plaintiff’s

23

Administrative Motion is also DENIED.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: April 23, 2013

27
28

G:\CRBALL\2011\1543\order re april 22 sbmsns.wpd

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE