Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 351

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer re April 22, 2013 Submissions. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 ROBIN ANTONICK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. C 11-01543 CRB ORDER RE APRIL 22, 2013 SUBMISSIONS v. ELECTRONIC ARTS INC, Defendant. / 16 17 Yesterday the Court received: a letter from Plaintiff’s counsel (dkt. 348); an 18 Administrative Motion from Plaintiff’s counsel, which seeks to file under seal an exhibit to 19 Plaintiff’s counsel’s letter (dkt. 349); and a letter from Defendant’s counsel, objecting to 20 Plaintiff’s counsel’s letter (dkt. 350). The Court finds Plaintiff’s counsel’s letter improper, 21 and will not consider it. See Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) (“Once a reply is filed, no additional 22 memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval . . .”). Plaintiff’s 23 Administrative Motion is also DENIED. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: April 23, 2013 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2011\1543\order re april 22 sbmsns.wpd CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?