Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 458

ORDER granting 456 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Setting Deadlines as to 443 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law that Antonick's Claims are Barred by the Statute of Limitations. Responses due by 7/5/2013. Replies due by 7/11/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/1/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2013)

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document456 Filed06/28/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN - #111703
[e-mail]
ERIC H. MACMICHAEL - #231697
[e-mail]
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780
[e-mail]
TIA A. SHERRINGHAM - #258507
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-397-7188
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois citizen,
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California
corporation,

16

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)

Defendant.

17

Judge:

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Trial Date: June 17, 2013

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
767464.01

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document456 Filed06/28/13 Page2 of 3

1
2
3
4

Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”),
hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2013, EA submitted a motion for judgment as a matter of law
that Antonick’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations (“JMOL motion”);

5

WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court heard argument on EA’s JMOL motion;

6

WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court ordered Antonick to file an opposition to EA’s

7
8
9
10

JMOL motion and ordered EA to file a reply in support of its JMOL motion;
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, the Court requested that the parties set a briefing schedule
for Antonick’s opposition and EA’s reply;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through

11

their respective counsel of record, that Antonick will file an opposition to EA’s JMOL motion on

12

July 5, 2013, and that EA will file a reply in support of its JMOL motion on July 11, 2013.

13

Defendant’s undersigned counsel, Susan J. Harriman, hereby attests that Leonard W.

14

Aragon, counsel for Plaintiff, concurs in the filing of this Stipulation, in accordance with Civil

15

Local Rule 5-1.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: June 28, 2013

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By: /s/ Leonard W. Aragon
LEONARD W. ARAGON
Robert B. Carey (Pro Hac Vice)
11 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Stuart M. Paynter (226147)
Jennifer L. Murray (Pro Hac Vice)
THE PAYNTER LAW FIRM PLLC
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
767464.01

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document456 Filed06/28/13 Page3 of 3

1
2

DATED: June 28, 2013

3

Susan J. Harriman (111703)
R. Adam Lauridsen (243780)
Tia A. Sherringham (258507)
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
By: /s/ Susan J. Harriman
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing,

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
DATED:
14
15

July 1, 2013
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
767464.01