Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,

Filing 526

ORDER granting 524 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Rule 50 Briefing And Hearing Schedule filed by Electronic Arts Inc.. Rule 50(b)Motion due by 8/15/2013. Responses due by 8/29/2013. Reply due by 9/6/2013. Motion Hearing reset for 9/13/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/30/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN - #111703
[e-mail]
ERIC H. MACMICHAEL - #231697
[e-mail]
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780
[e-mail]
TIA A. SHERRINGHAM - #258507
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-397-7188
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois citizen,
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

15

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California
corporation,

16

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING
SCHEDULE

Defendant.

17

Judge:

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Date Filed: March 30, 2011
Trial Date: June 17, 2013

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
772625.01

1
2
3

Plaintiff Robin Antonick and Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) hereby stipulate as
follows:
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, the Court set the following schedule for EA’s previously-

4

filed Rule 50(a) motion: Antonick’s opposition by August 2, 2013, EA’s reply by August 12,

5

2013, and motion hearing on August 23, 2013;

6

WHEREAS, Rule 50(b) provides that the mechanism for obtaining JMOL postverdict is a

7

Rule 50(b) motion that renews the preverdict Rule 50(a) motion, the parties have agreed that EA

8

will file a single Rule 50(b) motion (“EA’s Rule 50(b) Motion”);

9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed upon a revised briefing and hearing schedule for
EA’s Rule 50(b) Motion;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through
their respective counsel of record, on the following schedule for EA’s Rule 50(b) Motion:

13

•

EA’s Motion: August 15, 2013;

14

•

Antonick’s Opposition: August 29, 2013;

15

•

EA’s Reply: September 6, 2013; and

16

•

Hearing: September 13, 2013 (or as soon thereafter as the Court’s schedule

17

permits).

18

This stipulation does not alter the previously ordered briefing and hearing dates regarding

19

Antonick’s motion for prejudgment interest.

20

EA’s undersigned counsel, Susan J. Harriman, hereby attests that Robert B. Carey,

21

counsel for Antonick, concurs in the filing of this Stipulation, in accordance with Civil Local

22

Rule 5-1.

23

Dated: July 29, 2013

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

24
25

By:

26
27
28

/s/ Susan J. Harriman
SUSAN J. HARRIMAN
ERIC H. MACMICHAEL
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN
TIA A. SHERRINGHAM
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
772625.01

1

Dated: July 29, 2013

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO
LLP

2
3

By:
/s/ Robert B. Carey
ROBERT B. CAREY (Pro Hac Vice)
LEONARD W. ARAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBIN ANTONICK IC
S DISTR

5

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

FO

LI

H

11

ERED

reyer
________________________________________
rles R. B
dge Cha R. BREYER
Ju
HON. CHARLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ER
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
C
N
CALIFORNIAS T R I C T O F
DI

RT

10

Dated: July 31, 2013

O ORD

IT IS S

NO

9

TC

A

7

TE
TA

RT
U
O

S

6

R NIA

4

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RULE 50 BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)
772625.01