Tiffany (NJ), LLC v. Miki Boutique, Inc et al

Filing 34

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Pursuant to stipulation, defendants shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by June 10, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 5/9/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

EDWIN K. PRATHER (Cal. Bar No. 190536)
LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN PRATHER
461 Bush Street, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone:
415-881-7774
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California
corporation; MEI NG, an individual, individually
and jointly, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE

7
8

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

TIFFANY (NJ), LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California )
corporation, and MEI NG, an individual,
)
individually and jointly, d/b/a YUKI
)
BOUTIQUE and DOES 1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

Case No. CV-11-1563 MMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint Filed: March 31, 2011

Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), Defendants MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California
corporation, and MEI NG, an individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE
(“Defendants”) and Plaintiff TIFFANY (NJ), LLC, and by and through their respective counsel,
hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on
March 31, 2011.
RECITALS
1.

On March 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging trademark infringement,

counterfeiting, and false designation of origin, against Defendants.
2.

Defendants were served with the summons and complaint on April 5, 2011. By

previous stipulation, a response to the complaint by Defendants is currently due on May 10, 2011.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. CV 11-1563 MMC]

1

3.

To allow for continuing settlement discussions, Plaintiff and Defendants have

2

stipulated and agreed that a response to the complaint by Defendants shall be due no later than June

3

10, 2011. The parties aver that the requested extension will not alter the date of any event or

4

deadline already fixed by Court order.

5
6
7

STIPULATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel,
that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint by June 10, 2011.

8
9

Dated: May 6, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN PRATHER

10
11

By:

12
13

s/ Edwin K. Prather
EDWIN K. PRATHER
Attorneys for Defendants
MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved
California corporation, and MEI NG, an
individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a
YUKI BOUTIQUE

14
15
16
17

Dated: May 6, 2011

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY &
ROMAN LLP
KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN#71450)
ANNE E. KEARNS (SBN #183336)

18
19
20

By:

21

s/ Anne E. Kearns
ANNE E. KEARNS
Attorneys for Plaintiff TIFFANY (NJ),
LLC

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. CV 11-1563 MMC]

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
complaint by June 10, 2011.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
DATED: May 9, 2011

6
7

______________________________________
THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B

11

I, EDWIN K. PRATHER, herby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that I have

12
13

obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories listed

14

above.

15

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct.

16

Executed on May 6, 2011, in the City of San Francisco, California.

17

Dated: May 6, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

18

LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN PRATHER

19
20

By:

21

s/ Edwin K. Prather
EDWIN K. PRATHER
Attorneys for Defendants
MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved
California corporation, and MEI NG, an
individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a
YUKI BOUTIQUE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. CV 11-1563 MMC]