McCoy v. Alameda County et al

Filing 21

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [re 20 Stipulation, filed by Alameda County Sheriff's Department, Stuart E. Barnes, N. Gonzalgo, Arthur McCoy, Gregory Ahern, Alameda County, B. Baker, Erich D. Marapao]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/4/2011. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

ARTHUR MCCOY,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
No. C 11-01569 WHA

v.
ALAMEDA COUNTY, a municipal corporation,
ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
a municipal corporation, GREGORY AHERN in his
capacity as Sheriff for County of Alameda, Deputy B.
BARKER, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
for County of Alameda, Deputy ERICH D.
MARAPAO, individually and in his capacity as
Sheriff for County of Alameda, Deputy N.
GONZALGO, individually and in his capacity as
Sheriff for County of Alameda, Deputy STUART E.
19 BARNES, individually and in his capacity as
Sheriff for County of Alameda, and DOES 1–10,
inclusive, individually and in their capacities as
Sheriffs for County of Alameda,

ORDER DENYING
REQUEST TO
CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

Defendants.

20

/

21
22
23
24

The Court DENIES the parties’ stipulation to continue the case management conference for
ten weeks.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: October 4, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE