Bright v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 30

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Daniel S. Sharp (SBN 220996) 1611 Telegraph Ave, Suite 1030 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 451-2010 Fax: (510) 451-2011 dss@danielsharplaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff JNANA BRIGHT 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy BLAKE P. LOEBS, State Bar #145790 Chief of Civil Rights Litigation SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3668 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: blake.loebs@sfgov.org 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GEORGE GASCON and BUDDY SIGUIDO 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 CASE NO.: CV 11-01586 JNANA BRIGHT, 21 Plaintiff, 22 vs. 23 24 25 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE. PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GEORGE GASCON, BUDDY SIGUIDO and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, Defendants. 26 27 Plaintiff JNANA BRIGHT (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CITY AND COUNT OF SAN Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 1 1 FRANCISCO, GEORGE GASCON and OFFICER BUDDY SIGUIDO (collectively “Defendants”), 2 through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate to the following protective order: 3 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 4 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 5 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 6 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 7 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 8 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 9 discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are 10 entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. 11 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no 12 entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 13 that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission 14 from the court to file material under seal. 15 16 17 18 2. The parties further DEFINITIONS 2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 19 medium or manner generated, stored or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 20 transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery 21 by any Party in this matter. 22 2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, 23 stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards developed under 24 F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). This material includes but is not limited to officer personnel records, juvenile 25 records, and information on witnesses identified in each parties’ initial disclosures. 26 27 2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or non-party would Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 2 1 create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. This 2 material includes but is not limited to officer personnel records, juvenile records, and information on 3 witnesses identified in each parties’ initial disclosures. 4 5 2.5 Producing Party. 6 7 2.6 10 2.7 Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 13 14 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – 11 12 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 8 9 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 15 2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 16 2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as 17 their support staffs). 18 2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent 19 to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 20 consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a competitor of a 21 Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a 22 competitor of a Party’s. 23 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 24 (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, storing, 25 retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors. 26 3. SCOPE 27 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 3 1 defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, 2 summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or 3 counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 4 4. 5 Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 6 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 7 otherwise directs. 8 5. 9 DURATION DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 10 Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order 11 must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 12 standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material, 13 documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the 14 material, documents, items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 15 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 16 Mass, indiscriminate, or routine designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be 17 clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or 18 retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), 19 expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 20 If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it designated for 21 protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially 22 asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the 23 mistaken designation. 24 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order 25 (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material 26 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is 27 disclosed or produced. Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 4 1 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 2 (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 3 depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 4 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top of 5 each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 7 making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection 8 being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 9 ONLY”). 10 A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 11 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which 12 material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the 13 material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 14 EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, 15 the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under 16 this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 17 appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 18 ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the 19 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected 20 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the 21 level of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 22 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 23 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, 24 that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the close 25 of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any portions 26 of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When 27 it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 5 1 it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party 2 that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or 3 proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to twenty (20) days to identify the specific portions of the 4 testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted 5 (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only those 6 portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 20 days shall be 7 covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. 8 Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the 9 court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or 10 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or non-party 11 offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. 12 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for 13 any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the 14 container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or 15 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the information or 16 item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected 17 portions, specifying whether they qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 18 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 19 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to 20 designate qualified information or items as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 21 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 22 protection under this Order for such material. 23 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” after the 24 material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must 25 make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with this Order. 26 27 6. If material is appropriately designated as CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 6 1 confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 2 economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its 3 right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the 4 original designation is disclosed. 5 6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating 6 Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring 7 directly (in voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) with counsel for 8 the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the 9 confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to 10 review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is 11 offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next 12 stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 13 6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality 14 designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and serve a 15 motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) that 16 identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such motion 17 must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the 18 meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity 19 the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet 20 and confer dialogue. 21 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 22 Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question 23 the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation. 24 25 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed 26 or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 27 defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 7 1 categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been 2 terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11, below (FINAL 3 DISPOSITION). 4 5 6 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 7 ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose 8 any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 9 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as 10 employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 11 litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached 12 hereto as Exhibit A; 13 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the 14 Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 15 “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 16 (c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party who whom 17 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound 18 by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 19 (d) the Court and its personnel; 20 (e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure 21 is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 22 Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 23 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 24 reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit 25 A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material 26 must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted 27 under this Stipulated Protective Order. Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 8 1 (g) 2 7.3 the author of the document or the original source of the information. Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 3 Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating 4 Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 5 – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 6 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as 7 employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 8 litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached 9 hereto as Exhibit A; 10 (b) House Counsel of a Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably 11 necessary for this litigation, and (2) who has signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 12 (Exhibit A); 13 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably 14 necessary for this litigation, and (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 15 Order” (Exhibit A); 16 (d) the Court and its personnel; 17 (e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure 18 is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 19 Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 20 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 21 reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order”. Pages 22 of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be 23 separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under 24 this Stipulated Protective Order. In the event the parties cannot agree upon whether disclosure is 25 “reasonably necessary” said parties shall meet and confer on the matter and if there is no resolution 26 may seek relief from the Court. 27 (g) the author of the document or the original source of information. Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 9 1 2 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 3 If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that would 4 compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 5 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the Receiving Party must so notify the 6 Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately and in no event more than three court 7 days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or 8 court order. 9 The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the 10 subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 11 subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver 12 a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that caused the 13 subpoena or order to issue. 14 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this 15 Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its 16 confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party 17 shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – 18 and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in 19 this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 20 9. 21 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 22 Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the 23 Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized 24 disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person 25 or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request 26 such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached 27 hereto as Exhibit A. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 10 1 10. 2 Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after 3 appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any 4 Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil 5 Local Rule 79-5. 6 11. 7 Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty (60) days 8 after the final termination of this action, defined as the dismissal or entry of judgment by the district 9 court, or if an appeal is filed, the disposition of the appeal, each Receiving Party must return all 10 Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” 11 includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing 12 any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving 13 Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected 14 Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the 15 Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day 16 deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or 17 destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, 18 summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected material. Notwithstanding 19 this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, 20 transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain 21 Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain 22 subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 23 24 25 26 27 12. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL FINAL DISPOSITION MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 11 1 information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no 2 Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence any of the material covered by this 3 Protective Order. 4 13. 5 Should any party fail to comply with this PROTECTIVE ORDER, that party and that party’s 6 counsel shall be liable for all costs associated with enforcing this agreement, including but not limited 7 to all attorney fees in amounts to be determined by the Court. The non-complying party and their 8 counsel may also be subject to additional sanctions or remedial measures, such as contempt, evidentiary 9 or terminating sanctions. The criteria for determining whether sanction are appropriate shall be the 10 same as with other discovery isssues as per the Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil of Civil 11 Procedure. 12 13 SANCTIONS IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: September 26, 2011 14 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy BLAKE P. LOEBS Chief of Civil Rights Litigation SEAN CONNOLLY Deputy City Attorney 15 16 17 18 By: 19 20 21 22 *[The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all other signatories and shall serve in lieu of their signature.] 23 24 /s/ *Blake P. Loebs BLAKE P. LOEBS Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GEORGE GASCON and BUDDY SIGUIDO Dated: September 26, 2011 By: /s/ Daniel S. Sharp DANIEL S. SHARP Attorney for Plaintiff JNANA BRIGHT 25 26 27 Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 12 ORDER 1 BASED ON THE ABOVE ENTERED STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 9/30/11 S Dated: RT U O Honorable EDWARD M CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE dward Judge E NO 7 RT 8 ER 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 EXHIBIT A 27 Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 13 n M. Che A H 9 R NIA 6 D RDERE OO IT IS S FO 5 LI UNIT ED 4 S DISTRICT TE _____________________________ C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 2 I, _____________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its 3 entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District 4 Court for the Northern District of California on __________ in the case of Bright v. CCSF; Case No. 5 CV 11-01586. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective 6 Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and 7 punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any 8 information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in 9 strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 10 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern 11 District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if 12 such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 13 I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 14 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as 15 my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to 16 enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 17 Date: _________________________________ 18 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 19 Printed name: ______________________________ 20 Signature: __________________________________ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Stipulation and [Proposed ]Protective Order Bright v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. C11-01586 EMC 14

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?