Rose v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JULY 29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY; ADVISING PARTIES RE: CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS. Granting 15 . All parties are to appear at July 29, 2011 Case Management Conference by telephone. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

MEARL ROSE
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

No. C-11-1595 MMC

v.
STELLAR RECOVERY, INC.,
Defendant.

/

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JULY
29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; DIRECTING ALL
PARTIES TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY; ADVISING PARTIES
RE: CHAMBERS COPIES AND
PROPOSED ORDERS

Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request for Telephonic Appearance at Case
Management Conference” (“Request”), filed July 11, 2011. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
plaintiff’s Request is hereby GRANTED. All parties shall appear telephonically at the Case
Management Conference scheduled for July 29, 2011.
The Court notes, however, that plaintiff failed to submit a chambers copy of said
Request and neither party has submitted a chambers copy of the Joint Case Management
Statement, filed July 15, 2011. Consequently, both plaintiff and defendant have violated
General Order 45, which requires parties to lodge “no later than noon on the business day
following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document
that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the
judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45
§ VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.

1

Chesney ¶ 2 (setting forth same requirement). Further, plaintiff has violated Civil Local

2

Rule 7-2(c) by failing to include a proposed order with her Request. See Civil L.R. 7-2(c)

3

(“Unless excused by the Judge who will hear the motion, each motion must be

4

accompanied by a proposed order.”)

5

The parties are hereby advised that a failure to comply with the Local Rules of this

6

District and the Court’s orders may result in sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking

7

from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been

8

timely provided to the Court or any motion which is not accompanied by a proposed order.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

Dated: July 19, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2