Rose v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JULY 29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY; ADVISING PARTIES RE: CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS. Granting 15 . All parties are to appear at July 29, 2011 Case Management Conference by telephone. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-11-1595 MMC
STELLAR RECOVERY, INC.,
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JULY
29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; DIRECTING ALL
PARTIES TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY; ADVISING PARTIES
RE: CHAMBERS COPIES AND
Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request for Telephonic Appearance at Case
Management Conference” (“Request”), filed July 11, 2011. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
plaintiff’s Request is hereby GRANTED. All parties shall appear telephonically at the Case
Management Conference scheduled for July 29, 2011.
The Court notes, however, that plaintiff failed to submit a chambers copy of said
Request and neither party has submitted a chambers copy of the Joint Case Management
Statement, filed July 15, 2011. Consequently, both plaintiff and defendant have violated
General Order 45, which requires parties to lodge “no later than noon on the business day
following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document
that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the
judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45
§ VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.
Chesney ¶ 2 (setting forth same requirement). Further, plaintiff has violated Civil Local
Rule 7-2(c) by failing to include a proposed order with her Request. See Civil L.R. 7-2(c)
(“Unless excused by the Judge who will hear the motion, each motion must be
accompanied by a proposed order.”)
The parties are hereby advised that a failure to comply with the Local Rules of this
District and the Court’s orders may result in sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking
from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been
timely provided to the Court or any motion which is not accompanied by a proposed order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?