Rose v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JULY 29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY; ADVISING PARTIES RE: CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS. Granting 15 . All parties are to appear at July 29, 2011 Case Management Conference by telephone. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 MEARL ROSE Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C-11-1595 MMC v. STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., Defendant. / ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JULY 29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY; ADVISING PARTIES RE: CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request for Telephonic Appearance at Case Management Conference” (“Request”), filed July 11, 2011. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, plaintiff’s Request is hereby GRANTED. All parties shall appear telephonically at the Case Management Conference scheduled for July 29, 2011. The Court notes, however, that plaintiff failed to submit a chambers copy of said Request and neither party has submitted a chambers copy of the Joint Case Management Statement, filed July 15, 2011. Consequently, both plaintiff and defendant have violated General Order 45, which requires parties to lodge “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. 1 Chesney ¶ 2 (setting forth same requirement). Further, plaintiff has violated Civil Local 2 Rule 7-2(c) by failing to include a proposed order with her Request. See Civil L.R. 7-2(c) 3 (“Unless excused by the Judge who will hear the motion, each motion must be 4 accompanied by a proposed order.”) 5 The parties are hereby advised that a failure to comply with the Local Rules of this 6 District and the Court’s orders may result in sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking 7 from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been 8 timely provided to the Court or any motion which is not accompanied by a proposed order. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: July 19, 2011 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?