James v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Filing 121

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 119 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 RICK JAMES, by and through The James Ambrose Johnson, Jr., 1999 Trust, his successor in interest, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, No. C 11-1613 SI; No. C 11-2431 SI Related Case: No. C 11-5321 SI ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL v. UMG RECORDINGS, INC. Defendant. / 13 14 Plaintiffs and Defendant UMGR have filed a stipulation that Defendant UMGR may file under 15 seal: (a) the portions of Defendant’s Opposition referencing specific royalty rates, and (b) the entire 16 attached Goldman Declaration. They request an order to that effect. 17 The request to file the portions of the Opposition referencing royalty rates is GRANTED. 18 The Goldman Declaration contains sixteen exhibits. Exhibits Two through Fifteen consist of 19 recording agreements between Plaintiffs and Defendant. The Court has reviewed the Goldman 20 Declaration, and has not found good cause to file the entirety under seal. The parties were over- 21 inclusive, and failed to designate for file under seal only specific portions of the document that would 22 qualify as privileged, be protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise be entitled to protection under the 23 law. The stipulation for leave to file the Goldman Declaration under seal is DENIED. This order 24 resolves Docket No. 119. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 26, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?