James v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Filing 43

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 7 David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375) dmg@phillaw.com Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No. 112532) nac@phillaw.com Alexander H. Tuzin (State Bar No. 267760) aht@phillaw.com PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 50 California Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-398-0900 Facsimile: 415-398-0911 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 6 Jeffrey D. Goldman (State Bar No. 155589) jgoldman@jmbm.com Ryan S. Mauck (State Bar No. 223173) rmauck@jmbm.com Brian M. Yates (State Bar No. 241798) byates@jmbm.com JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4308 Telephone: 310-203-8080 Facsimile: 310-203-0567 Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 RICK JAMES, by and through THE JAMES AMBROSE JOHNSON, JR., 1999 TRUST, his successor in interest, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, vs. Case No. CV 11-01613 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE The Honorable Susan Illston UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1. STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 2 Plaintiff in the above-captioned action and Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. (“UMGR”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff in this case filed its complaint on April 1, 2011; 4 WHEREAS, on June 1, 2011, the Court issued an Order relating the case entitled Rob 5 Zombie et al. v. UMG Recordings, Inc., Case No. CV 11-02431 SI (the “Zombie Action”), to this 6 case; 7 WHEREAS, on June 10, 2011, UMGR filed in this case: (a) a Motion to Dismiss Action 8 for Improper Venue or Transfer Action to Central District of California (“James Venue Motion”); 9 and (b) a Motion to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of California Business & 10 11 Professions Code § 17200 (“James Motion to Dismiss”); WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, UMGR filed in the Zombie Action: (a) a Motion to Dismiss 12 Action for Improper Venue or Transfer Action to Central District of California (“Zombie Venue 13 Motion”); and (b) a Motion to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of California 14 Business & Professions Code § 17200 (“Zombie Motion to Dismiss”); 15 16 17 18 19 WHEREAS, on July 27, 2011, The Tubes filed in the Zombie Action a Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff and Additional Class Representative (“Motion to Intervene”); WHEREAS, the James Venue Motion, James Motion to Dismiss, Zombie Venue Motion, Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene have all been fully briefed; WHEREAS, by notice dated August 18, 2011, the hearing on the Zombie Venue Motion, 20 Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene was continued until September 2, 2011 at 21 9:00 a.m. (Zombie Docket No. 25); 22 WHEREAS, on August 19, 2011, the Court’s law clerk confirmed by email that the 23 hearing on the James Venue Motion and James Motion to Dismiss was also continued until 24 September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., such that all pending motions in both actions are currently 25 scheduled to be heard at that time; 26 WHEREAS, due to prior-scheduled commitments, counsel are unavailable for a hearing 27 on September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and the parties therefore wish to continue the hearing on all 28 pending motions to the next hearing date that is available for the Court and the parties; -2- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, due to prior-schedule commitments, counsel for the parties are unavailable for a hearing on September 9, 2011 or September 16, 2011; WHEREAS, the parties therefore jointly and respectfully request that the Court continue the hearing on all pending motions until September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.; 5 WHEREAS, the purpose of this request is not for delay; 6 WHEREAS, the requested continuance will not alter any other deadlines set by the Court; 7 WHEREAS, concurrent with the filing of this stipulation, the parties in the Zombie Action 8 are filing a similar request to continue the hearing on the motions pending in that case (i.e., the 9 Zombie Venue Motion, Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene) to the same hearing 10 date, September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.; 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 12 1. The parties respectfully request that the hearing on the pending James Venue 13 Motion and James Motion to Dismiss be continued from September 2, 2011 until September 22, 14 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 19 Dated: August 22, 2011 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP DAVID M. GIVEN NICHOLAS A. CARLIN ALEXANDER H. TUZIN 20 21 22 By: /s/ David M. Given David M. Given Counsel for Plaintiff Rick James et al. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 Dated: August 22, 2011 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP JEFFREY D. GOLDMAN RYAN S. MAUCK BRIAN M. YATES 2 3 4 By: 5 6 /s/ Jeffrey D. Goldman Jeffrey D. Goldman Counsel for Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. 7 8 9 10 I, Roger N. Heller, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 11 document. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in 12 the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 13 By: /s/ Roger N. Heller 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, that: 3 4 1. The hearing on the pending James Venue Motion and James Motion to Dismiss is continued until September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 5 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 DATED: 8/25/11 _________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge 11 12 13 934737.1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 7 David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375) dmg@phillaw.com Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No. 112532) nac@phillaw.com Alexander H. Tuzin (State Bar No. 267760) aht@phillaw.com PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 50 California Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-398-0900 Facsimile: 415-398-0911 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 RICK JAMES, by and through THE JAMES AMBROSE JOHNSON, JR., 1999 TRUST, his successor in interest, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 15 16 DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE vs. 17 Case No. CV 11-01613 SI UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, The Honorable Susan Illston 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 I, David M. Given, declare as follows: 2 1. I am admitted to practice before this Court and am an attorney at Phillips, Erlewine 3 & Given LLP, counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned action. I submit this declaration in 4 support of the parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date. The facts set 5 forth herein are based upon personal knowledge. 6 2. By notice dated August 18, 2011, the hearing on the pending Zombie Venue 7 Motion, Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene was continued until September 2, 8 2011 at 9:00 a.m. (Zombie Docket No. 25). 9 3. On August 19, 2011, the Court’s law clerk confirmed by email that the hearing on 10 the pending James Venue Motion and James Motion to Dismiss was also continued until 11 September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., such that all pending motions in both actions are currently 12 scheduled to be heard at that time. 13 4. Due to prior-scheduled commitments, counsel are unavailable for a hearing on 14 September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and the parties therefore wish to continue the hearing on all 15 pending motions to the next hearing date that is available for the Court and the parties. Due to 16 prior-schedule commitments, counsel for the parties are unavailable for a hearing on September 9, 17 2011 or September 16, 2011. The parties therefore jointly and respectfully request that the Court 18 continue the hearing on all pending motions until September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 19 5. The parties previously requested the following time modifications in this case: (a) 20 Stipulation To Extend Time To File Answer Or Other Response To Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed 21 May 5, 2011 (James Docket No. 12); (b) Second Stipulation To Extend Time To File Answer Or 22 Other Response To Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed June 3, 2011 (James Docket No. 20); and (c) 23 Stipulation To Continue Hearing Date And Amend Briefing Schedule On Defendant UMG 24 Recordings, Inc.’s Pending Motions To Dismiss And Transfer, filed June 23, 2011 (James Docket 25 No. 27), which the Court granted by Order dated June 28, 2011 (James Docket No. 30). 26 27 6. The purpose of the requested continuance is not delay. The requested continuance will not alter any other deadlines set by the Court. 28 -2- DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI 1 2 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 3 Executed this 22nd day of August 2011 at San Francisco, California. 4 __/s/ David M. Given________ 5 David M. Given 6 7 8 9 10 I, Roger N. Heller, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 11 document. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in 12 the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 13 By: 14 /s/ Roger N. Heller 15 16 934744.1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?