James v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)
1
7
David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375)
dmg@phillaw.com
Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No.
112532)
nac@phillaw.com
Alexander H. Tuzin (State Bar No.
267760)
aht@phillaw.com
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP
50 California Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-398-0900
Facsimile: 415-398-0911
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
6
Jeffrey D. Goldman (State Bar No. 155589)
jgoldman@jmbm.com
Ryan S. Mauck (State Bar No. 223173)
rmauck@jmbm.com
Brian M. Yates (State Bar No. 241798)
byates@jmbm.com
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL
LLP
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4308
Telephone: 310-203-8080
Facsimile: 310-203-0567
Attorneys for Defendant
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
RICK JAMES, by and through THE JAMES
AMBROSE JOHNSON, JR., 1999 TRUST, his
successor in interest, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. CV 11-01613 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING
DATE
The Honorable Susan Illston
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
2
Plaintiff in the above-captioned action and Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. (“UMGR”),
by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiff in this case filed its complaint on April 1, 2011;
4
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2011, the Court issued an Order relating the case entitled Rob
5
Zombie et al. v. UMG Recordings, Inc., Case No. CV 11-02431 SI (the “Zombie Action”), to this
6
case;
7
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2011, UMGR filed in this case: (a) a Motion to Dismiss Action
8
for Improper Venue or Transfer Action to Central District of California (“James Venue Motion”);
9
and (b) a Motion to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of California Business &
10
11
Professions Code § 17200 (“James Motion to Dismiss”);
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, UMGR filed in the Zombie Action: (a) a Motion to Dismiss
12
Action for Improper Venue or Transfer Action to Central District of California (“Zombie Venue
13
Motion”); and (b) a Motion to Dismiss Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of California
14
Business & Professions Code § 17200 (“Zombie Motion to Dismiss”);
15
16
17
18
19
WHEREAS, on July 27, 2011, The Tubes filed in the Zombie Action a Motion to
Intervene as Plaintiff and Additional Class Representative (“Motion to Intervene”);
WHEREAS, the James Venue Motion, James Motion to Dismiss, Zombie Venue Motion,
Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene have all been fully briefed;
WHEREAS, by notice dated August 18, 2011, the hearing on the Zombie Venue Motion,
20
Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene was continued until September 2, 2011 at
21
9:00 a.m. (Zombie Docket No. 25);
22
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2011, the Court’s law clerk confirmed by email that the
23
hearing on the James Venue Motion and James Motion to Dismiss was also continued until
24
September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., such that all pending motions in both actions are currently
25
scheduled to be heard at that time;
26
WHEREAS, due to prior-scheduled commitments, counsel are unavailable for a hearing
27
on September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and the parties therefore wish to continue the hearing on all
28
pending motions to the next hearing date that is available for the Court and the parties;
-2-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, due to prior-schedule commitments, counsel for the parties are unavailable
for a hearing on September 9, 2011 or September 16, 2011;
WHEREAS, the parties therefore jointly and respectfully request that the Court continue
the hearing on all pending motions until September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.;
5
WHEREAS, the purpose of this request is not for delay;
6
WHEREAS, the requested continuance will not alter any other deadlines set by the Court;
7
WHEREAS, concurrent with the filing of this stipulation, the parties in the Zombie Action
8
are filing a similar request to continue the hearing on the motions pending in that case (i.e., the
9
Zombie Venue Motion, Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene) to the same hearing
10
date, September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.;
11
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
12
1.
The parties respectfully request that the hearing on the pending James Venue
13
Motion and James Motion to Dismiss be continued from September 2, 2011 until September 22,
14
2011 at 9:00 a.m.
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
18
19
Dated: August 22, 2011
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP
DAVID M. GIVEN
NICHOLAS A. CARLIN
ALEXANDER H. TUZIN
20
21
22
By:
/s/ David M. Given
David M. Given
Counsel for Plaintiff Rick James et al.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
Dated: August 22, 2011
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL
LLP
JEFFREY D. GOLDMAN
RYAN S. MAUCK
BRIAN M. YATES
2
3
4
By:
5
6
/s/ Jeffrey D. Goldman
Jeffrey D. Goldman
Counsel for Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc.
7
8
9
10
I, Roger N. Heller, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
11
document. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in
12
the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
13
By:
/s/ Roger N. Heller
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, that:
3
4
1.
The hearing on the pending James Venue Motion and James Motion to Dismiss is
continued until September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.
5
6
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
DATED:
8/25/11
_________________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
11
12
13
934737.1
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
7
David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375)
dmg@phillaw.com
Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No.
112532)
nac@phillaw.com
Alexander H. Tuzin (State Bar No.
267760)
aht@phillaw.com
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP
50 California Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-398-0900
Facsimile: 415-398-0911
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
RICK JAMES, by and through THE JAMES
AMBROSE JOHNSON, JR., 1999 TRUST, his
successor in interest, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
15
16
DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING DATE
vs.
17
Case No. CV 11-01613 SI
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
The Honorable Susan Illston
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
I, David M. Given, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am admitted to practice before this Court and am an attorney at Phillips, Erlewine
3
& Given LLP, counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned action. I submit this declaration in
4
support of the parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date. The facts set
5
forth herein are based upon personal knowledge.
6
2.
By notice dated August 18, 2011, the hearing on the pending Zombie Venue
7
Motion, Zombie Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Intervene was continued until September 2,
8
2011 at 9:00 a.m. (Zombie Docket No. 25).
9
3.
On August 19, 2011, the Court’s law clerk confirmed by email that the hearing on
10
the pending James Venue Motion and James Motion to Dismiss was also continued until
11
September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., such that all pending motions in both actions are currently
12
scheduled to be heard at that time.
13
4.
Due to prior-scheduled commitments, counsel are unavailable for a hearing on
14
September 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and the parties therefore wish to continue the hearing on all
15
pending motions to the next hearing date that is available for the Court and the parties. Due to
16
prior-schedule commitments, counsel for the parties are unavailable for a hearing on September 9,
17
2011 or September 16, 2011. The parties therefore jointly and respectfully request that the Court
18
continue the hearing on all pending motions until September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.
19
5.
The parties previously requested the following time modifications in this case: (a)
20
Stipulation To Extend Time To File Answer Or Other Response To Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed
21
May 5, 2011 (James Docket No. 12); (b) Second Stipulation To Extend Time To File Answer Or
22
Other Response To Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed June 3, 2011 (James Docket No. 20); and (c)
23
Stipulation To Continue Hearing Date And Amend Briefing Schedule On Defendant UMG
24
Recordings, Inc.’s Pending Motions To Dismiss And Transfer, filed June 23, 2011 (James Docket
25
No. 27), which the Court granted by Order dated June 28, 2011 (James Docket No. 30).
26
27
6.
The purpose of the requested continuance is not delay. The requested continuance
will not alter any other deadlines set by the Court.
28
-2-
DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
1
2
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct.
3
Executed this 22nd day of August 2011 at San Francisco, California.
4
__/s/ David M. Given________
5
David M. Given
6
7
8
9
10
I, Roger N. Heller, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
11
document. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in
12
the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
13
By:
14
/s/ Roger N. Heller
15
16
934744.1
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
DECLARATION OF DAVID M. GIVEN
CASE NO. CV 11-01613 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?