Yoshioka v. Charles Schwab Corporation et al
Filing
139
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 138 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Schwab Holdings, Inc, Charles Schwab Corporation, Set/Reset Deadlines as t o 138 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/24/2012. Replies due by 9/7/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/28/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KENNETH G. HAUSMAN (57252)
Kenneth.Hausman@aporter.com
DEBORAH S. SCHLOSBERG (254621)
Deborah.Schlosberg@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: 415.471.3100
Facsimile:
415.471.3400
Attorneys for Defendants
THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, SCHWAB
HOLDINGS, INC. AND CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.,
INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
JOY YOSHIOKA, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
Case No.: CV 11 1625 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
vs.
THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION,
SCHWAB HOLDINGS, INC. and CHARLES
SCHWAB & CO., INC.,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CV 11 1625 EMC
1
WHEREAS, at the Status Conference held in this action on June 19, 2012, the Court lifted
2
the stay in the action only to allow Defendants The Charles Schwab Corporation, Schwab Holdings,
3
Inc., and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (“Defendants”) to file a motion to dismiss pursuant to the
4
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b) (“Motion”) with a hearing date set for Friday,
5
September 21, 2012 and a further case management conference set for the same date;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, Defendants and Plaintiff Joy Yoshioka (“the Parties”) have met and conferred
and reached an agreed-upon briefing schedule; and
WHEREAS, the agreed-upon briefing schedule does not alter the date of the hearing on the
Motion set by the Court or the time by which briefing on the Motion will be complete;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their
respective counsel, subject to approval of the Court, as follows:
1.
Defendants shall file their Motion on or before August 3, 2012, and set it for hearing
on September 21, 2012;
14
2.
15
24, 2012;
16
3.
17
2012; and
18
4.
Plaintiff Joy Yoshioka shall file any opposition to the Motion on or before August
Defendants shall file a reply in support of the Motion on or before September 7,
The undersigned Parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this
19
Stipulation as an Order.
20
Dated: July 6, 2012
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
21
22
By:
23
24
25
/s/ Kenneth G. Hausman
KENNETH G. HAUSMAN
Attorneys for Defendants
THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION,
SCHWAB HOLDINGS, INC. AND CHARLES
SCHWAB & CO., INC.
26
27
28
-1STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CV 11 1625 EMC
5
Thomas K. Caldwell
tkcaldwell@mhclaw.com (Pro Hac Vice)
T. John Kirk
kirktjohn@mhclaw.com (Pro Hac Vice)
MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO, P.C.
10100 Lantern Road, Suite 150
Fishers, Indiana 46037
Telephone: 317.598.2040
Facsimile: 317.539.2050
6
By:
1
Dated: July 6, 2012
2
3
4
/s/T. John Kirk
T. JOHN KIRK
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOY YOSHIOKA
7
8
RYAN BAKHTIARI
rkb@aublaw.com
AIDIKOFF, UHL & BAKHTIARI
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 303
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: 310.274.0666
Facsimile: 310.859.0513
9
10
11
12
Barbara Quinn Smith (Ohio Bar 0055328)
bqsmith@mhclaw.com (Pro Hac Vice)
MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO, P.C.
9853 Johnnycake Ridge Road, Suite 302
Mentor, Ohio 44060
Telephone: 440.354.4010
Facsimile: 440.848.8175
13
14
15
16
Tim Berry
tim@iraideas.com (Pro Hac Vice)
TIM BERRY P.C.
11812 E. Toledo
Gilbert, Arizona 85295
Telephone: 602.652.2875
17
18
19
20
ATTESTATION
21
Pursuant to General Order No. 45X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
22
document has been obtained from T. John Kirk.
23
Dated: July 6, 2012.
24
By:
/s/Kenneth G. Hausman
KENNETH G. HAUSMAN
25
26
27
28
-2STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CV 11 1625 EMC
ORDER
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation between the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS
2
3
4
5
HEREBY ORDERED, that
1.
Defendants shall file their Motion on or before August 3, 2012, and set it for hearing
28
on September 21, 2012;
6
2.
7
24, 2012;
8
3.
Defendants shall file any reply in support of the Motion on or before September 7,
4.
28
at 1:30 p.m.
The hearing on the Motion remains set for September 21, 2012, or as soon thereafter
15
RT
17
dwa
Judge E
ER
H
18
19
hen
rd M. C
NO
16
OO
IT IS S
DIFIED
AS MO
R NIA
__________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RDERE
FO
14
RT
U
O
13
C
TA
LI
12
as the Court’s schedule may allow. The Further CMC is reset for September 28, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
July 9
S DISTRICT
Dated: ___________________, 2012.
TE
A
11
S
10
2012;
UNIT
ED
9
Plaintiff Joy Yoshioka shall file any opposition to the Motion on or before August
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CV 11 1625 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?