Bekele et al v. Ford et al
Filing
93
ORDER Re Parties' Settlement Conference Submissions. Response due 12/8/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/06/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
BEKELE ET AL,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
No. C-11-01640 WHA (DMR)
ORDER RE PARTIES' SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE SUBMISSIONS
v.
14
FORD ET AL,
15
Defendants.
___________________________________/
16
17
On September 20, 2011, the court issued a Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement
18
Conference Order (Docket No. 66), in which the parties were ordered to submit a Settlement
19
Conference Statement in advance of the Settlement Conference. The Order provided that the
20
Settlement Conference Statement shall not exceed ten (10) pages of text, and the parties were
21
encouraged to include as exhibits any key documents and deposition excerpts up to twenty (20)
22
pages.
23
The court has received the parties' submissions, which are voluminous and violate the court's
24
September 20, 2011 Order. By no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 8, 2011, the parties shall submit
25
a brief letter via email directing the court to the key exhibits attached to the Settlement Conference
26
statements. Each party should make all efforts to limit exhibits to twenty (20) pages. If unable to do
27
so, the letter must include a statement establishing good cause to exceed the page limit. The letter
28
shall be submitted to dmrpo@cand.uscourts.gov with a copy to opposing counsel.
S
. Ryu
onna M
DONNA M. RYU
Judge D
NO
5
Dated: December 6, 2011
RT
6
United States Magistrate Judge
ER
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
A
H
7
R NIA
4
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
FO
3
LI
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
2
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?