Bekele et al v. Ford et al

Filing 93

ORDER Re Parties' Settlement Conference Submissions. Response due 12/8/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/06/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 BEKELE ET AL, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 No. C-11-01640 WHA (DMR) ORDER RE PARTIES' SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SUBMISSIONS v. 14 FORD ET AL, 15 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 16 17 On September 20, 2011, the court issued a Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement 18 Conference Order (Docket No. 66), in which the parties were ordered to submit a Settlement 19 Conference Statement in advance of the Settlement Conference. The Order provided that the 20 Settlement Conference Statement shall not exceed ten (10) pages of text, and the parties were 21 encouraged to include as exhibits any key documents and deposition excerpts up to twenty (20) 22 pages. 23 The court has received the parties' submissions, which are voluminous and violate the court's 24 September 20, 2011 Order. By no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 8, 2011, the parties shall submit 25 a brief letter via email directing the court to the key exhibits attached to the Settlement Conference 26 statements. Each party should make all efforts to limit exhibits to twenty (20) pages. If unable to do 27 so, the letter must include a statement establishing good cause to exceed the page limit. The letter 28 shall be submitted to with a copy to opposing counsel. S . Ryu onna M DONNA M. RYU Judge D NO 5 Dated: December 6, 2011 RT 6 United States Magistrate Judge ER 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A H 7 R NIA 4 DERED O OR IT IS S FO 3 LI IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 2 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?