Poligrates v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 11 Stipulation filed by Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/3/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DAVID F. MCDOWELL (CA SBN 125806)
DMcDowell@mofo.com
PURVI G. PATEL (CA SBN 270702)
PPatel@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: 213.892.5200
Facsimile: 213.892.5454
Attorneys for Defendant
BED BATH & BEYOND INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
BONNIE POLIGRATES, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC., and Does 1
through 100, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
Case No. 3:11-cv-01661-EMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT BED BATH &
BEYOND INC.’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
[L.R. 6-2]; DECLARATION OF
PURVI G. PATEL; PROPOSED
ORDER
Hon. Edward M. Chen
18
Complaint Filed: March 4, 2011
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
la-1122112
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BED BATH & BEYOND INC.’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:11-cv-01661-EMC
1
STIPULATION
2
Pursuant to Rule 6-2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the
3
Northern District of California, Plaintiff Bonnie Poligrates (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Bed Bath
4
& Beyond Inc. (“BBB”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
5
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on March 4, 2011, and served
BBB with the Complaint on or about March 8, 2011;
7
8
9
WHEREAS, BBB filed a Notice of Removal to remove the action to this Court on April 6,
2011;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Defendant’s Time to Respond
10
to Complaint [L.R. 6-1(a)] [Doc. No. 8] and this Court’s Order granting the parties’ stipulation
11
[Doc. No. 9], BBB’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is May 3, 2011;
12
WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding the factual bases of
13
Plaintiff’s claims, and are currently exchanging, on an informal basis, records pertaining to the
14
alleged transactions that form the basis of Plaintiff’s Complaint;
15
WHEREAS, good cause exists for an extension of BBB’s deadline to respond to the
16
Complaint because BBB requires additional time to investigate Plaintiff’s allegations and prepare
17
its response to the Complaint;
18
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the deadline for BBB to answer or otherwise
19
respond to the Complaint shall be extended by seventeen (17) days, to and including May 20,
20
2011; and
21
22
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that BBB shall have to
and including May 20, 2011, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
23
24
25
26
27
28
la-1122112
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BED BATH & BEYOND INC.’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:11-cv-01661-EMC
1
Dated: May 2, 2011
2
DAVID F. MCDOWELL
PURVI G. PATEL
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
3
4
By:
/s/ Purvi G. Patel
Purvi G. Patel
5
Attorneys for Defendant
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
6
7
8
Dated: May 2, 2011
9
DANIEL H. QUALLS
ROBIN G. WORKMAN
AVIVA N. ROLLER
QUALLS & WORKMAN, L.L.P.
10
11
By:
/s/ Daniel H. Qualls
Daniel H. Qualls
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bonnie Poligrates, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated
13
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
By:
UNIT
ED
May 3, 2011
Dated: _______________________
Honorable Edward M. Chen
20
21
dwar
Judge E
A
H
ER
LI
RT
25
en
d M. Ch
NO
24
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
22
23
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA _________________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
26
27
28
la-1122112
R NIA
18
FO
17
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BED BATH & BEYOND INC.’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:11-cv-01661-EMC
C
1
2
3
DECLARATION OF PURVI G. PATEL
I, Purvi G. Patel, hereby declare as follows:
1.
I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the courts of the State of California
4
and am a member of the Bar of this Court. I am an associate at Morrison & Foerster LLP,
5
counsel of record for Defendant Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (“BBB”) in the above-captioned action.
6
I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge.
7
8
9
2.
I submit this declaration in support of the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Defendant
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.’s Time to Respond to Complaint [L.R. 6-2].
3.
The parties previously stipulated to a twenty (20) day extension of BBB’s deadline
10
to respond to the Complaint from April 13, 2011 to May 3, 2011. [Doc. No. 8.] That deadline to
11
respond has been fixed by this Court’s Order granting the parties’ Stipulation to Extend
12
Defendant’s Time to Respond to Complaint [L.R. 6-1(a)]. [Doc. No. 9.]
13
4.
The parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding the factual bases of
14
Plaintiff’s claims. The parties are currently exchanging, on an informal basis, records pertaining
15
to the alleged transactions that form the basis of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
16
17
18
5.
BBB requests the extension of time to investigate Plaintiff’s allegations and
prepare its response to the Complaint.
6.
The parties submit this stipulation to request that BBB’s deadline to respond to the
19
Complaint, which has been fixed by Court order, be extended by seventeen (17) days to and
20
including May 20, 2011. This extension of time will not affect any hearing or proceeding on the
21
Court’s calendar and is not made for purposes of delay.
22
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
23
true and correct.
24
Executed this 2nd day of May, 2011, in Los Angeles, California.
25
/s/ Purvi G. Patel
Purvi G. Patel
26
27
28
la-1122112
4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BED BATH & BEYOND INC.’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:11-cv-01661-EMC
_______
1
2
ECF ATTESTATION
I, Purvi G. Patel, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BED BATH & BEYOND INC.’S TIME TO
4
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-2]; DECLARATION OF PURVI G. PATEL;
5
PROPOSED ORDER. In accordance with General Order 45 X.B, concurrence in the filing of
6
this document has been obtained from Daniel H. Qualls and Robin G. Workman, counsel for
7
Plaintiff, and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for
8
the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party.
9
Dated: May 2, 2011
10
DAVID F. MCDOWELL
PURVI G. PATEL
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
11
12
By:
13
/s/ Purvi G. Patel
Purvi G. Patel
Attorneys for Defendant
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
la-1122112
5
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BED BATH & BEYOND INC.’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:11-cv-01661-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?