E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. USA Performance Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 56

ORDER GRANTING 55 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/24/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document55 Filed07/23/12 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN, Bar No. 57117 MORGAN K. LOPEZ, Bar No. 215513 JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE, Bar No. 238559 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 210-2800 Facsimile: (925) 945-1975 10 MORRIS JAMES LLP P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., Pro Hac Vice Pending Jason C. Jowers, Pro Hac Vice Pending 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302) 888-6800 Facsimile: (302) 571-1750 E-mail: pcollins@morrisjames.com jjowers@morrisjames.com 11 Attorneys for E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 6 7 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 USA PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC., PERFORMANCE GROUP (USA), INC., WALTER LIEW, and JOHN LIU, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-cv-01665-JSW JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White Hearing Date: None Pursuant to the Court’s March 27, 2012 Order, Plaintiff E. I. du Pont de Nemours and 25 Company (“DuPont”) and defendants Walter Liew and USA Performance Technology, Inc. 26 (collectively “USAPT”) submit this Joint Status Report. The parties request that the stay in this 27 matter set to expire on July 30, 2012, remain in place for an additional 60 days, through 28 September 28, 2012. -1JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document55 Filed07/23/12 Page2 of 4 On August 23, 2011, the United States filed United States v. Walter Liew and Christina 1 2 Liew, No. CR-11-0573-RS. On February 7, 2012, the United States filed a superseding 3 indictment in said action. Id. at Docket # 64. DuPont’s Position: The superseding indictment alleges that defendant Walter Liew, his 4 5 wife, Christina Liew, and several other defendants violated multiple federal trade secret and 6 economic espionage laws when they stole – and utilized – the trade secrets at issue in this action. 7 Inter alia, Mr. Liew is charged with Conspiracy to Commit Economic Espionage, Conspiracy to 8 Commit Theft of Trade Secrets, Possession of Trade Secrets, Conveying Trade Secrets, Witness 9 Tampering, and False Statements. See id. ¶¶ 16-97. In addition, the superseding indictment 10 identifies five DuPont trade secrets relating to its TiO2 technology at issue in the criminal action. 11 Id. ¶ 14. USAPT’s Position: Defendants believe that the superseding indictment speaks for itself, 12 13 and no further explanation or commentary is appropriate or needed. 14 On September 7, 2011, this Court issued an Order relating the criminal proceeding with 15 this action, pursuant to its determination that this action and the criminal proceeding are related 16 within the meaning of Crim. L.R. 8-1(b). (Docket # 42.)1 On September 23, 2011, the parties filed a joint status report requesting that the stay 17 18 initially entered on July 22, 2011 (Docket # 39), be extended for an additional 60 days. (Docket 19 # 44.) On September 29, 2011, the Court granted the parties’ request. (Docket # 45.) On November 23, 2011, the parties filed an additional joint status report requesting that 20 21 the stay be extended for an additional 60 days. (Docket # 46.) The Court granted the parties’ 22 request on November 29, 2011. (Docket # 48.) On January 24, 2012, the parties filed an additional joint status report requesting that the 23 24 stay be extended for an additional 60 days. (Docket # 49.) The Court granted the parties’ 25 request on January 31, 2012. (Docket # 50.) 26 27 28 1 On September 16, 2011, DuPont dismissed without prejudice defendant John Liu pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). (Docket # 43.) Thus, the only remaining defendants in this action are Walter Liew and his company, USA Performance Technology Inc. -2JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document55 Filed07/23/12 Page3 of 4 1 On March 26, 2012, the parties filed an additional joint status report requesting that the 2 stay be extended for an additional 60 days. (Docket # 51.) The Court granted the parties’ 3 request on March 27, 2012. (Docket # 52.) 4 On May 23, 2012, the parties filed an additional joint status report requesting that the 5 stay be extended for an additional 60 days. (Docket # 53). The Court granted the parties’ 6 request on May 23, 2012. (Docket # 54). 7 8 9 The undersigned counsel request that the stay remain in place for an additional 60 days, at which time the parties will update the Court. Dated: July 23, 2012 10 11 12 13 MORRIS JAMES LLP P. CLARKSON COLLINS, JR. JASON C. JOWERS 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 14 15 16 By /s/ Morgan K. Lopez Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN MORGAN K. LOPEZ JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Dated: July 23, 2012 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. DANIEL S. MOUNT ON LU KEVIN M. PASQUINELLI RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650 333 West San Carlos Street San Jose, CA 95110-2740 By /s/ Daniel S. Mount Attorneys for Defendants USA Performance Technology, Inc., and Walter Liew 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document55 Filed07/23/12 Page4 of 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Having read and considered the Joint Status Report, 3 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 4 The parties’ request that the stay be extended until September 28, 2012 is hereby 5 GRANTED. Counsel shall submit a joint status report on or before September 21, 2012. 6 7 8 July ____, 2012 24 9 10 Honorable Jeffrey S. White UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?