E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. USA Performance Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 78

ORDER Extending Stay of Action RE 77 Status Report. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/25/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2014)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document77 Filed03/24/14 Page1 of 3 1 5 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN, Bar No. 57117 MORGAN K. LOPEZ, Bar No. 215513 JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE, Bar No. 238559 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 210-2800 Facsimile: (925) 945-1975 6 Attorneys for E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 USA PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC., PERFORMANCE GROUP (USA), INC., WALTER LIEW, and JOHN LIU, 16 Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-cv-01665-JSW JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White Hearing Date: None 18 Pursuant to the Court’s February 25, 2014 Order, Plaintiff E. I. du Pont de Nemours and 19 20 Company (“DuPont”) and defendants Walter Liew and USA Performance Technology, Inc. 21 (collectively “USAPT”) submit this Joint Status Report. The parties request that the stay in this 22 matter set to expire on March 31, 2014, remain in place for an additional 90 days, through 23 June 30, 2014. 24 On April 6, 2011, DuPont filed the instant suit. (Docket # 1.) Defendants filed their 25 Substituted Answer and Counterclaim on July 11, 2011. (Docket # 35.) The action was first 26 stayed on July 22, 2011. (Docket # 39.) 27 /// 28 /// -1JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document77 Filed03/24/14 Page2 of 3 1 On August 23, 2011, the United States filed United States v. Walter Liew and Christina 2 Liew, No. CR-11-0573-RS. On February 7, 2012, the United States filed a superseding 3 indictment in said action. (Id. at Docket # 64.) On March 12, 2013, the United States filed a 4 Second Superseding Indictment. (Id. at Docket # 269.) On or about January 7, 2014, trial began 5 in the criminal action. On March 5, 2014, the jury returned its verdict, finding Mr. Liew and 6 USAPTI guilty of all counts with which they were charged. (Id. at Docket # 804.) 7 Sentencing in the criminal case is scheduled for June 10, 2014, at which time the Court 8 will consider restitution to DuPont. As the Court’s disposition of the restitution issue may affect 9 the further course of this case, the parties request that the stay be extended an additional 90 days, 10 to and including June 30, 2014, at which time the parties will report to the Court regarding their 11 proposals for further proceedings. 12 Dated: March 24, 2014 13 14 15 16 By /s/ Morgan K. Lopez Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN MORGAN K. LOPEZ JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Dated: March 24, 2014 MOUNT SPELMAN & FINGERMAN P.C. DANIEL S. MOUNT KEVIN M. PASQUINELLI RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650 333 West San Carlos Street San Jose, CA 95110-2740 By /s/ Daniel S. Mount Attorneys for Defendants USA Performance Technology, Inc., and Walter Liew 24 25 26 27 28 -2JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY Case3:11-cv-01665-JSW Document77 Filed03/24/14 Page3 of 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Having read and considered the Joint Status Report, 3 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 4 The parties’ request that the stay be extended until June 30, 2014 is hereby GRANTED. 5 Counsel shall submit a joint status report on or before June 23, 2014. 6 7 March ____, 2014 25 8 Honorable Jeffrey S. White UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?