Software Research, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 12

ORDER GRANTING 11 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/28/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) shosie@hosielaw.com GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205) gbishop@hosielaw.com DIANE S. RICE (CA Bar No. 118303) drice@hosielaw.com WILLIAM P. NELSON (CA Bar No. 196091) wnelson@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP Transamerica Pyramid, 34th Floor 600 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 247-6000 Tel. (415) 247-6001 Fax 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Software Research, Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 SOFTWARE RESEARCH, INC., Case No. 3:11-cv-01676-JSW Plaintiff, 15 16 17 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 18 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-01676-JSW Plaintiff Software Research, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Hewlett-Packard 1 2 Company (“Defendant”), hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on or about April 6, 2011, Plaintiff served its Complaint upon Defendant; 3 4 and 5 WHEREAS, no trial date has yet been set in this action; and 6 WHEREAS, Defendant requires additional time to respond to the Complaint, and 7 Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to extend the time by which Defendant must answer or 8 otherwise respond to the Complaint by an additional 30 days, to and including May 27, 2011; 9 and 10 WHEREAS, no other extensions of time have occurred in this action: 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that Defendant will 12 have to and including May 27, 2011, to serve and file an answer or other response to the 13 Complaint. 14 DATED: April 27, 2011 15 HOSIE RICE LLP 16 18 By: ___/s/ William P. Nelson_________ William P. Nelson Attorneys for Plaintiff Software Research, Inc. 19 ROPES & GRAY, et al. 20 /s/ James R. Batchelder By: _______________________________ James R. Batchelder Attorney for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. DATED: April 27, 2011 27 /s/ William P. Nelson _______________________________ William P. Nelson 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 2 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-01676-JSW ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant will have to and including May 27, 2011, to serve and file an answer or other response to the Complaint. 3 4 28 Dated: April ___, 2011 ________________________________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 3 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-01676-JSW DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL AND E-MAIL 1 2 I, Janine DeAndre, am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of 3 4 San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within 5 action. My business address is Hosie Rice LLP, Transamerica Pyramid, 34th Floor, 600 6 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California, 94111. 7 On April 27, 2011, I served the following attached 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 9 by e-mail and placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon in 10 11 the United States Post Office mail box at San Francisco, California, addressed to the following 12 parties: 13 James R. Batchelder Ropes & Gray 1900 University Avenue 6th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284 james.batchelder@ropesgray.com 14 15 16 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 17 foregoing is true and correct. 18 DATED: April 27, 2011 19 ____/s/ Janine DeAndre__________________ Janine DeAndre 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 4 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-01676-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?