Ibrahim v. City & County of San Francisco

Filing 16

ORDER REFERRING LITIGANT TO THE FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/1/11. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Appendix)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 7/1/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT 9 REFERRAL FORM 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TO: Jennifer Greengold Supervising Attorney Federal Legal Assistance & Pro Bono Project Volunteer Legal Services Program of BASF 450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, rm 15-2796 San Francisco, CA 94102 jgreengold@sfbar.org 12 13 14 15 16 REFERRING JUDGE: Honorable Richard Seeborg DATE: July 1, 2011 RE: Referral of Indigent Litigant for Appointment of Counsel 17 18 19 20 Please be advised that the following pro se litigant is being referred to the Bar Association of 21 San Francisco Volunteer Legal Services Program for appointment of a volunteer attorney, for the 22 limited purpose of a settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, through the Federal Pro Bono 23 Project. The litigant has been given a copy of the instruction sheet for litigants. One copy of the 24 court file is enclosed, or will be forwarded as soon as it is available. 25 Name: Saeed Ibrahim 26 Address: 2082 24th Avenue 27 28 San Francisco, CA 94116 Telephone #: (415) 948-7419 NO. C 11-1695 RS FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT REFERRAL FORM 1 Case Name: Saaed Ibrahim v. City and County of San Francisco 2 Status of Case: Stayed pending appointment of counsel 3 4 5 6 Dated: 7/1/11 7 8 9 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. C 11-1695 RS FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT REFERRAL FORM 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?