Ibrahim v. City & County of San Francisco
Filing
16
ORDER REFERRING LITIGANT TO THE FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/1/11. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Appendix)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
*E-Filed 7/1/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT
9
REFERRAL FORM
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
TO:
Jennifer Greengold
Supervising Attorney
Federal Legal Assistance & Pro Bono Project
Volunteer Legal Services Program of BASF
450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, rm 15-2796
San Francisco, CA 94102
jgreengold@sfbar.org
12
13
14
15
16
REFERRING JUDGE:
Honorable Richard Seeborg
DATE:
July 1, 2011
RE:
Referral of Indigent Litigant for Appointment of Counsel
17
18
19
20
Please be advised that the following pro se litigant is being referred to the Bar Association of
21
San Francisco Volunteer Legal Services Program for appointment of a volunteer attorney, for the
22
limited purpose of a settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, through the Federal Pro Bono
23
Project. The litigant has been given a copy of the instruction sheet for litigants. One copy of the
24
court file is enclosed, or will be forwarded as soon as it is available.
25
Name:
Saeed Ibrahim
26
Address:
2082 24th Avenue
27
28
San Francisco, CA 94116
Telephone #:
(415) 948-7419
NO. C 11-1695 RS
FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT REFERRAL FORM
1
Case Name:
Saaed Ibrahim v. City and County of San Francisco
2
Status of Case:
Stayed pending appointment of counsel
3
4
5
6
Dated: 7/1/11
7
8
9
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 11-1695 RS
FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT REFERRAL FORM
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?