Ibrahim v. City & County of San Francisco

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 48 TO CONTINUE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/1/2012 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/10/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
JOSHUA S. WHITE, State Bar #237223
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAEED J. IBRAHIM,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; OFFICER CHU, in his
individual and official capacity; OFFICER
LEE, in his individual and official capacity;
OFFICER PENA, in his individual and official
capacity; OFFICER STOCKWELL, in his
individual and official capacity; SERGEANT
BOHANAN, in his individual and official
capacity; SERGEANT CHAN, in his
individual and official capacity;
LIEUTENANT CAPLAN, in his individual
and official capacity; OFFICER SIGUIDO, in
his individual and official capacity; and DOES
1 to 20,

Case No. C 11-01695 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE DISMISSAL
Hearing Date: September 27, 2012
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Location:
Courtroom of the Hon. Richard
Seeborg

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
Stip to Continue OSC re Dismissal
Case No.: C11-01695 RS

1

n:\lit\li2011\110994\00730552.doc

1

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement in this case;

2

WHEREAS, the settlement is contingent upon approval by the Police Commission and the San

3

Francisco Board of Supervisors;

4

WHEREAS, the settlement has been approved by the Police Commission and the Rules

5

Committee of the Board of Supervisors. On September 18, 2012, the settlement will come before the

6

full Board. In the event that the settlement is approved, the Mayor will have ten days to approve or

7

veto the settlement. If the Mayor approves the settlement, the settlement is then final, and it can take

8

up to three weeks to provide Plaintiff with the settlement check.

9

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the OSC to November 1,

10

2012, a date by which defense counsel is confident that, assuming the settlement receives final

11

approval, Plaintiff will have received his check.

12
13

Dated: September 7, 2012
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Attorney
JOSHUA S. WHITE
Deputy City Attorney

14
15
16

By:
/s/
JOSHUA S. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendants

17
18
19

Dated: September 7, 2012
DLA PIPER
TODD TORAL
KATHLEEN KIZER
VISHALI SINGAL
ALEC CIERNY

20
21
22

By:
/s/
KATHLEEN KIZER
Attorneys for Plaintiff

23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip to Continue OSC re Dismissal
Case No.: C11-01695 RS

2

n:\lit\li2011\110994\00730552.doc

ORDER

1

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the OSC re

2
3

Dismissal is continued to November 1, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.

4
5

Dated:

9/10/12
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip to Continue OSC re Dismissal
Case No.: C11-01695 RS

3

n:\lit\li2011\110994\00730552.doc