Ibrahim v. City & County of San Francisco

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 50 FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/18/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TODD C. TORAL (CA Bar No. 197706) todd.toral@dlapiper.com KATHLEEN S. KIZER (CA Bar No. 246035) kathleen.kizer@dlapiper.com VISHALI SINGAL (CA Bar No. 267481) vishali.singal@dlapiper.com ALEC CIERNY (CA Bar No. 275230) alec.cierny@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105-2933 Tel: 415.836.2500 Fax: 415.836.2501 Attorneys for Plaintiff SAEED J. IBRAHIM, Individually 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 SAEED J. IBRAHIM, individually, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; OFFICER CHU, in his individual and official capacity; OFFICER LEE, in his individual and official capacity; OFFICER PENA, in her individual and official capacity; OFFICER STOCKWELL, in her individual and official capacity; SERGEANT BOHANAN, in his individual and official capacity; SERGEANT CHAN, in his individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT CAPLAN, in his individual and official capacity; and OFFICER SIGUIDO, in his individual and official capacity; and DOES 1 to 20, 27 Defendants. 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRA NCI SCO WEST\239128501.1 1 The undersigned parties, through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY 2 STIPULATE as follows: 3  4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A settlement agreeable to all parties has been reached in the above-entitled matter; and  All parties agree to dismissal of this action with prejudice. Therefore, having settled this dispute and having agreed to dismissal of this action with prejudice, the parties respectfully request that an Order for Dismissal be entered. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 18, 2012 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 11 12 By: 13 /s/ Todd C. Toral, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 15 16 17 Dated: October 18, 2012 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Attorney JOSHUA S. WHITE Deputy City Attorney 18 19 20 By: /s/ JOSHUA S. WHITE Attorneys for Defendants 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRA NCI SCO WEST\239128501.1 1 2 3 4 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 10/18/12 7 HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS WEST\239128501.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?