Ibrahim v. City & County of San Francisco
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 50 FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/18/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TODD C. TORAL (CA Bar No. 197706)
todd.toral@dlapiper.com
KATHLEEN S. KIZER (CA Bar No. 246035)
kathleen.kizer@dlapiper.com
VISHALI SINGAL (CA Bar No. 267481)
vishali.singal@dlapiper.com
ALEC CIERNY (CA Bar No. 275230)
alec.cierny@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
Tel: 415.836.2500
Fax: 415.836.2501
Attorneys for Plaintiff SAEED J. IBRAHIM,
Individually
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
SAEED J. IBRAHIM, individually,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
v.
CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
ENTIRE ACTION
JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; OFFICER CHU, in his
individual and official capacity; OFFICER
LEE, in his individual and official capacity;
OFFICER PENA, in her individual and
official capacity; OFFICER
STOCKWELL, in her individual and
official capacity; SERGEANT
BOHANAN, in his individual and official
capacity; SERGEANT CHAN, in his
individual and official capacity;
LIEUTENANT CAPLAN, in his individual
and official capacity; and OFFICER
SIGUIDO, in his individual and official
capacity; and DOES 1 to 20,
27
Defendants.
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION
CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRA NCI SCO
WEST\239128501.1
1
The undersigned parties, through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY
2
STIPULATE as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A settlement agreeable to all parties has been reached in the above-entitled matter;
and
All parties agree to dismissal of this action with prejudice.
Therefore, having settled this dispute and having agreed to dismissal of this action with
prejudice, the parties respectfully request that an Order for Dismissal be entered.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 18, 2012
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
11
12
By:
13
/s/
Todd C. Toral, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
15
16
17
Dated: October 18, 2012
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER
Chief Trial Attorney
JOSHUA S. WHITE
Deputy City Attorney
18
19
20
By:
/s/
JOSHUA S. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendants
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION
CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRA NCI SCO
WEST\239128501.1
1
2
3
4
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its
entirety.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: 10/18/12
7
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. C 11-01695-RS
WEST\239128501.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?