United States of America et al v. Gutierrez

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING OSC TO 7/15/11 AT 1:30 PM re 9 Stipulation filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/11. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
THOMAS MOORE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
THOMAS M. NEWMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
11th Floor Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

7
Attorneys for the United States of America
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
LOUIE VARGAS, Revenue Agent,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

13
Petitioners,
14
v.
15
LAURO A. GUTIERREZ, JR.,
16
Respondent.
17

Case No. 11-cv-1748-EMC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
ORDER

18

The parties, through there respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

19

1.

20

Petitioners filed this case on April 8, 2011, which seeks to enforce an Internal

Revenue Service summons that was served on Respondent.

21

2.

On April 19, 2011, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause and set a hearing

22

for June 1, 2011.

23

3.

25

On May 17, 2011, respondent filed a response to the motion. On that date, the
15
parties discussed the case, and agreed to continue the hearing for thirty days, or until July 13,
1:30 p.m.
2011, at 10:30 a.m. This continuance will permit respondent to arrange a time to meet with the

26

IRS, and discuss a resolution of this case.

24

27
28
Stipulation to Continue
Case No. 11-cv-1748-EMC

1

MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

1
2
Dated: May 24, 2011

______/s/_________________
THOMAS M. NEWMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Tax Division

Dated: May 24, 2011

3

/s/ Cindy Ho____
CINDY HO
Attorney for Respondent

4
5
6
7
8

ORDER

9

May 27, 2011
Dated: _______________

S
UNIT
ED

13
14

RT
U
O

12

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
__________________________
TA
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
AS MO

15
dwar
Judge E

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Continue
Case No. 11-cv-1748-EMC

2

A

H

ER

LI

RT

17

en

d M. Ch

NO

16

R NIA

11

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified)

FO

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C