Farrell v. OpenTable, Inc.
Filing
34
ORDER granting extension to briefing schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)
1
2
3
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
WILLIAM C. GRAY (Pro Hac Vice) (wgray@edelson.com)
350 North La Salle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone:
(312) 589-6370
6
SEAN REIS (184044) (sreis@reisfirm.com)
30021 Tomas Street, Ste. 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Telephone:
(949) 459-2124
Facsimile:
(858) 550-6420
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
4
5
WILLIAM FARRELL
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com)
KYLE C. WONG (224021) (kwong@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
MICHELLE C. DOOLIN (179445) (doolinmc@cooley.com)
DARCIE A. TILLY (239715) (dtilly@cooley.com)
4401 Eastgate Mall
San Diego, CA 92121
Telephone:
(858) 550-6000
Facsimile:
(858) 550-6420
Attorneys for Defendant
OPENTABLE, INC.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
WILLIAM FARRELL, on his own behalf and
on behalf of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
23
24
25
26
v.
OPENTABLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
d/b/a OpenTable.com,
Case No. C 11-01785-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING DATE FOR FILING OF
PLAINTIFF’ S MOTION FOR FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT
Defendant.
27
28
N.D. CAL. CASE NO. C 11-01785-SI
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DATE
FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’ S MOT. FOR FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
RECITALS
1
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2011, plaintiff William Farrell (“Plaintiff”) filed a putative class
2
3
action lawsuit against defendant OpenTable, Inc. (“OpenTable”);
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and OpenTable (collectively, the “Parties”) reached a settlement of
5
this Class Action, the terms of which were memorialized in an agreement “(Agreement”) between
6
the Parties (Dkt. 26-1 – 26-5);
WHEREAS, this Court granted Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and
7
8
Class Certification on September 27, 2011 (Dkt. 29);
9
WHEREAS, the Agreement specifies that Plaintiff shall submit his papers in support of
10
final approval “according to the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3[,]” namely
11
35 calendar days before the final approval hearing date;
WHEREAS, this Court set the hearing for final approval of the Agreement on January 20,
12
13
2012;
14
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requested that OpenTable stipulate to continue the deadline for the
15
filing of Plaintiff’s papers in support of final approval to January 6, 2012 so that Plaintiff can
16
address the recently filed objection to the Agreement in the same brief as his motion for final
17
approval and in light of the upcoming winter holidays; and
18
WHEREAS, OpenTable is amenable to granting Plaintiff an extension until January 6,
19
2012 to file his papers in support of final approval, so long as OpenTable’s deadline to file any
20
statement regarding (non-opposition to) the Agreement is also extended until January 6, 2012.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
N.D. CAL. CASE NO. C 11-01785-SI
2.
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DATE
FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’ S MOT. FOR FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
STIPULATION
1
2
NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed to between the Parties that they shall
3
jointly request the Court to continue the deadline for Plaintiff to file his papers in support of final
4
approval to January 6, 2012. The Parties further stipulate and agree to request the Court to
5
continue the deadline for OpenTable to file any statement regarding (non-opposition to) the
6
Agreement until January 6, 2012.
7
Dated: December 13, 2011
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
8
s/ William C. Gray
WILLIAM C. GRAY (Pro Hac Vice)
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIAM FARRELL
11
12
Dated: December 13, 2011
COOLEY LLP
13
s/ Michelle C. Doolin
Michelle C. Doolin (179445)
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
OPENTABLE, INC.
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER
17
18
Plaintiff shall file his Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement on
19
1/6/12
___________. Any statement regarding (non-opposition to) the Agreement that OpenTable may
20
wish to file is also due on ___________.
1/6/12
21
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
12/16/11
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
DATED
26
27
28
N.D. CAL. CASE NO. C 11-01785-SI
3.
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DATE
FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’ S MOT. FOR FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
FILER’S ATTESTATION
1
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that
3
all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting Date For
4
Filing Plaintiff’s Motion For Approval Of Class Action Settlement.
5
Dated: December 13, 2011
EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC
6
7
s/ William C. Gray
William C. Gray (Pro Hac Vice).
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
William Farrell
10
734171/SD
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
N.D. CAL. CASE NO. C 11-01785-SI
4.
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DATE
FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’ S MOT. FOR FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?