Green v. Health Net, Inc. et al

Filing 22

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TRANSFERRING CASE TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/26/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01797-JSW Document21 Filed05/24/11 Page1 of 3 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Steven G. Madison (Bar No. 101006) stevemadison@quinnemanuel.com 2 Shon Morgan (Bar No. 187736) shonmorgan@quinnemanuel.com 3 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 5 6 Karin Kramer (Bar No. 87346) karinkramer@quinnemanuel.com Arthur M. Roberts (Bar No. 275272) 7 arthurroberts@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 8 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 875-6600 9 Telephone: Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 10 Attorneys for Defendant International Business 11 Machines Corporation 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 CALLIE GREEN, individually and on behalf 16 of all others similarly situated, 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. 19 HEALTH NET, INC., HEALTH NET OF CALIFORNIA, INC., and INTERNATIONAL 20 BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, 21 Case No.: 11-cv-1797-JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TRANSFERRING CASE TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants. 22 23 Whereas, this case arises out of similar facts and involves largely the same parties as the 24 following cases pending in the Eastern District of California: Whitaker v. Health Net of California, 25 Inc., No. 11cv910; Assavarungnirum v.Health Net of California, Inc., No. 11cv1008; Avila v. 26 Health Net, Inc., No. 11cv1097; Bournas v. Health Net, Inc., No. 11cv1262; Bowman v. Health 27 Net, Inc., No. 11cv1320; 28 Case No. 11-cv-1797-JSW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Transferring Case to Eastern District Case3:11-cv-01797-JSW Document21 1 Filed05/24/11 Page2 of 3 Whereas, the parties in another related case in the Northern District, Eandi v. Health Net, 2 Inc., No. 11-cv-2002-JSW, have stipulated to transfer that case to the Eastern District; 3 Whereas, there were also three related cases filed in the Central District of California; 4 Whereas, on May 13, 2011, Judge Anderson of the Central District transferred one of those 5 related cases to the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), see Bowman v. 6 Health Net, Inc., No. 11-cv-2345, Dkt. No. 28 (C.D. Cal. May 13, 2011) (order attached as Exhibit 7 A) and filed an Order To Show Cause on May 13, 2011 as to why a second case should not be 8 transferred to the Eastern District; 9 Whereas, the parties have already filed stipulations to transfer to the Eastern District the 10 two remaining Central District cases, which are also before Judge Anderson; 11 Whereas, Judge Anderson found, and the parties do not here dispute, that the requirements 12 for a transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) are met: the Eastern District is convenient for the parties 13 and witnesses; that district has easier access to evidence not available in electronic format; it has 14 subject-matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over the parties; venue is proper; and several 15 other cases are pending there; 16 Whereas, it would be inefficient, expensive, and could lead to inconsistent results to have 17 this case pending in a different District from the other cases addressing the same event; 18 Whereas, for the reasons described above and for the reasons discussed in the Bowman 19 order, see Exhibit A, transfer of this case to the Eastern District of California is appropriate under 20 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). 21 Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate as follows: 22 1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the complaint shall be extended to June 23 17, 2011; 24 2. This case shall be transferred to the Eastern District of California under 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1404(a) for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice. 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-1797-JSW -2Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Transferring Case to Eastern District Case3:11-cv-01797-JSW Document21 1 DATED: May 24, 2011 2 Filed05/24/11 Page3 of 3 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 3 By /s/ Karin Kramer1 Karin Kramer Attorneys for Defendant International Business Machines Corporation 4 5 6 7 DATED: May 24, 2011 8 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL BRAYTON KONECKY LLP 9 10 By /s/ Todd M. Schneider Todd M. Schneider Attorneys for Plaintiff Callie Green 11 12 13 14 DATED: May 24, 2011 CROWELL & MORING LLP 15 16 By /s/ Ethan P. Schulman Ethan P. Schulman Attorneys for Defendants Health Net of California, Inc. and Health Net, Inc. 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 DATED: May 25 , 2011 23 24 Hon. Jeffrey S. White 25 26 27 1 28 I attest that I have obtained approval to file this document on behalf of the other signatories. Case No. 11-cv-1797-JSW -3Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Transferring Case to Eastern District

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?