Peinado v. City and County of San Francisco et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 selecting Mediation by City and County of San Francisco filed by City and County of San Francisco, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY
STIPULATION ANI) [PROPOSED1
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference wit/i a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of4DR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private ADR (please identfj process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unless othenvise ordered.)
other requested deadline
/s/ RENE PEINADO
Attorney for Plaintiff
RENE PEINADO in pro per
/s/ BLAKE P. LOEBS
Attorney for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
IT IS S
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
D IS T IC T O
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Page 2 of2
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, DEBORAH SANCHEZ, declare as follows:
I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the aboveentitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
On January 18, 2013, I served the following document(s):
STIPULATION AND IPROPOSEDI ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
on the following persons at the locations specified:
110 Pacific Avenue, #254
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 286-6100
Plaintiff in pro per
in the maimer indicated below:
BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of
the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing
the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorneys
Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that
for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.
I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed January 18, 2013, at San Francisco, California.
Stipulation and [Proposedj Order Selecting
ADR Process, Case No. Cl 1-01799-EMC
n:\lit\1i201 2\l 30373\0082 1775 doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?