Castain v. Astrue

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time re 18 Stipulation filed by Raymond J. Castain. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 11/18/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Marc V. Kalagian Attorney at Law: 149034 211 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 420 Long Beach, CA 90802 Tel: (562)437-7006 Fax: (562)432-2935 E-Mail:rohlfing.kalagian@rksslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff RAYMOND J. CASTAIN 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 RAYMOND J. CASTAIN, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security. 14 Defendant. 15 ) Case No. C 11-1816 MEJ ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 TO THE HONORABLE MARIA ELENA JAMES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their 19 20 respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall have a 30 day extension of time, to and 21 including December 17, 2011, in which to Motion for Summary Judgment. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 -1- 1 This request is made at the request of Plaintiff’s counsel to allow additional 2 time to fully research the issued presented. 3 DATE: November 18, 2011 4 Respectfully submitted, ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP /s/ Marc V. Kalagian 5 BY: _______________________ Marc V. Kalagian Attorney for plaintiff Raymond J. Castain 6 7 8 9 DATE: November 18, 2011 LAURA E. DUFFY United States Attorney 10 11 /s/ Patrick W. Snyder* 12 BY: ____________________________ Patrick W. Snyder Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for defendant Michael Astrue |*authorized by e-mail| 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 20 until December 17, 2011 to file his Motion for Summary Judgment. 21 22 23 24 November 18, 2011 Dated: __________________ _____________________________ MARIA ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?