Davis v. Cole Haan, Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/1/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Davis, 6 7 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS v. Cole Haan, Inc., 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 Concepcion, For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. CV11-01826 JSW (Related to C-11-2187 JSW) No. CV11-02187 JSW (Related to C-11-1826 JSW) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS 14 15 Cole Haan, Inc., Defendant. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further ORDERED that: A. DATES Jury Trial Date: 12/3/2012, at 8:00 a.m., Pretrial Conference: Monday, 10/29/2012, at 2:00 p.m. Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 8/17/2012, Last Day for Expert Discovery: 6/11/2012 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 5/11/2012 Further Case Management Conference: 5/18/2012, 1:30 p.m. Joint Supplemental Case Management Statement due: 5/11/2012 B. DISCOVERY 1 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 3 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 4 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 5 supplementation has been completed. 6 C. 7 By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be conducted by 8 9 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION February 29, 2012. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved. D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 12 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 13 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 14 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the 15 date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 16 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 17 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are 18 specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 19 leave of Court. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: November 1, 2011 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?