Davis v. Cole Haan, Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/1/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

Davis,

6
7
8

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

v.
Cole Haan, Inc.,

9

Defendant.

10

/

11
Concepcion,
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

No. CV11-01826 JSW
(Related to C-11-2187 JSW)

No. CV11-02187 JSW
(Related to C-11-1826 JSW)

12
Plaintiff,
13
v.

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

14
15

Cole Haan, Inc.,
Defendant.

16

/

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
ORDERED that:
A.

DATES

Jury Trial Date: 12/3/2012, at 8:00 a.m.,
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 10/29/2012, at 2:00 p.m.
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 8/17/2012,
Last Day for Expert Discovery: 6/11/2012
Close of Non-expert Discovery: 5/11/2012
Further Case Management Conference: 5/18/2012, 1:30 p.m.
Joint Supplemental Case Management Statement due: 5/11/2012

B.

DISCOVERY

1

The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses

3

pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of

4

non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all

5

supplementation has been completed.

6

C.

7

By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be conducted by

8
9

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

February 29, 2012. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved.
D.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)

12

without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline

13

contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties

14

may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the

15

date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to

16

a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule

17

that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are

18

specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain

19

leave of Court.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated: November 1, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2