National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc. et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 10/7/11 re 19 Stipulation filed by Collective Brands, Inc., Payless Shoe Source, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146)
(sacksr@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1888 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone:
(310) 712-6600
Facsimile:
(310) 712-8800
Sverker K. Högberg (SBN 244640)
(hogbergs@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
(650) 461-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 461-5700
Attorneys for Defendants
PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC, and
COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
vs.
PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC. and
COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC.,
19
Defendants.
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 11-01892-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RELATED DEADLINES
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 11-1892-EMC
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12 for the Northern District of
1
2
California, Defendants Payless Shoe Source, Inc. and Collective Brands, Inc. and Plaintiff National
3
Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (collectively, with Defendants, the “Parties”), by and
4 through their respective counsel, submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case
5 Management Conference and Related Deadlines.
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, Plaintiff filed its Complaint (Docket Entry (hereinafter,
6
7 “D.E.”) 1);
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2011, the Parties entered into a stipulation extending
8
9 Defendants’ time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint until July 19, 2011 (D.E. 8);
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2011, the Parties entered into a stipulation further extending
10
11 Defendants’ time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint until August 18, 2011 (D.E.
12 14), which the Court so-ordered on July 14, 2011 (D.E. 15);
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2011, the Court entered a Case Management Conference Order
13
14 in Reassigned Cases that (1) set a case management conference for August 19, 2011 (the “Case
15 Management Conference”), (2) directed the Parties to file a joint case management statement by August
16 12, 2011, and (3) directed the Parties to make any request to reschedule the Case Management
17 Conference, if at all, in writing and by stipulation no later than August 9, 2011 (D.E. 16);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 26(f), the Parties must meet and confer prior to
18
19 the Case Management Conference no later than July 29, 2011;
WHEREAS, the Parties currently are engaged in settlement discussions and wish to
20
21 continue the Case Management Conference and related deadlines in order to avoid incurring
22
unnecessary costs and expending unnecessarily the Court’s time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES JOINTLY STIPULATE TO, AND REQUEST
23
24
25
THE COURT TO ORDER, THE FOLLOWING:
1.
The Case Management Conference shall be continued until September 23, 2011, or until
another, later date to be chosen by the Court;
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 11-1892-EMC
1
2.
2
case management statement by August 12, 2011 shall be vacated and rescheduled
3
4
The currently-scheduled deadlines to meet and confer by July 29, 2011 and to file a joint
pursuant to the date set for the rescheduled Case Management Conference;
3.
5
By entering into this Stipulation, the Parties do not waive, and expressly preserve, any
and all rights, claims and defenses, including all defenses relating to jurisdiction, venue
6
and arbitrability.
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
Dated: July 27, 2011
Dated: July 27, 2011
/s/ Bruce D. Celebrezze
Bruce D. Celebrezze (SBN 102181)
(bruce.celebrezze@sedgwicklaw.com)
SEDGWICK LLP
One Market Plaza,
Steuart Tower, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 781-7900
Facsimile:
(415) 781-2635
/s/ Robert A. Sacks
Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146)
(sacksr@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1888 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone:
(310) 712-6600
Facsimile:
(310) 712-8800
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
National Union Fire Insurance
Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
17
18
Sverker K. Högberg (SBN 244640)
(hogbergs@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
(650) 461-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 461-5700
Attorneys for Defendants,
Payless Shoe Source, Inc. and
Collective Brands, Inc.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 11-1892-EMC
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
1
RT
U
O
RT
8
dward
Judge E
ER
H
9
10
R NIA
NO
7
n
M. Che
FO
6
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
LI
5
A
4
S
3
ORDERED. The CMC is reset from 8/19/11 to 10/7/11 at 9:00 a.m. A joint CMC Statement shall
be filed by 9/30/11.
S DISTRICT
Dated: __________________________
7/28/11
TE
C
EDWARD M. CHEN
TA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNIT
ED
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 11-1892-EMC
1
2
I, Robert A. Sacks, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Related
Deadlines. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Bruce D. Celebrezze has
concurred in this filing.
3
Dated: July 27, 2011
4
/s/ Robert A. Sacks
Robert A. Sacks
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC DEADLINES
CASE NO. CV 11-1892-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?