National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc. et al
Filing
79
ORDER resetting further CMC to 4/11/13. Case Management Statement due by 4/4/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/12/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
Stephen M. Prignano (admitted pro hac vice)
Clinton J. McCord (CA Bar No. 204749)
9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone:
(310) 860-8700
Facsimile:
(310) 860-3815
sprignano@edwardswildman.com
cmccord@edwardswildman.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
PITTSBURGH, PA.
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.,
15
16
Case No. CV-11-01892-EMC
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
PROPOSED ORDER
ORDER RESETTING CMC
Plaintiff,
vs.
17
18
PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC. and
COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC.,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National
Union”) submits this Further Case Management Conference Statement and Request for
Continuance of Further Case Management Conference. National Union states as follows:
1.
On August 31, 2012, the Court issued an Order staying this case pending
disposition of a motion by National Union to stay the related Kansas Action between the
parties. The Court set a further case management conference for December 14, 2012.
Page 1
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CMC STATEMENT & REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AM 18171973.1
1
2.
On December 11, 2012, with the motion in the Kansas Action still undecided,
2
the Court issued an Order continuing the case management conference in this action until
3
February 14, 2013, to allow for disposition of the motion in the Kansas Action.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3.
On January 4, 2013, the Court in the Kansas Action issued a Memorandum
and Order granting summary judgment in favor of National Union.
4.
Today, the clerk in the Kansas Action entered a “Judgment in a Civil Case”
dismissing the Kansas Action in its entirety, which renders this action moot.
5.
Upon the expiration of the applicable appeal period, National Union intends to
dismiss this action with prejudice.
6.
Accordingly, in the interests of judicial economy, National Union hereby
11
requests that the Court continue the further case management conference, currently set for
12
Thursday, February 14, 2013, forty-five (45) days, to allow for the anticipated dismissal of
13
this action.
14
Respectfully submitted,
15
Dated: February 7, 2013
/s/ Clinton J. McCord
Clinton J. McCord
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
16
17
18
19
Stephen M. Prignano
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
2800 Financial Plaza
Providence, RI 02903
20
21
22
Counsel for Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CMC STATEMENT & REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AM 18171973.1
1
2
ORDER
3
The above request for continuance of further case management conference is
4
5
approved. The further CMC currently set for Thursday, February 14, 2013, is hereby
4/11
vacated, and reset to ________________________, 2013, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th
6
Floor. If a stipulation of dismissal is filed prior to that date, the further CMC will be vacated
7
and no appearances will be necessary.
8
9
Dated:
A
NO
2/12/13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
11
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
10
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
HONORABLE EDWARDD CHEN
RE M.
12
ORDE
I
S MOD
RT
15
ER
17
A
H
16
FO
14
LI
13
R NIA
UNITED SO
DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS STATES FIED
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3
PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CMC STATEMENT & REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AM 18171973.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?