National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc. et al

Filing 79

ORDER resetting further CMC to 4/11/13. Case Management Statement due by 4/4/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/12/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP Stephen M. Prignano (admitted pro hac vice) Clinton J. McCord (CA Bar No. 204749) 9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (310) 860-8700 Facsimile: (310) 860-3815 sprignano@edwardswildman.com cmccord@edwardswildman.com Attorney for Plaintiff NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., 15 16 Case No. CV-11-01892-EMC PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PROPOSED ORDER ORDER RESETTING CMC Plaintiff, vs. 17 18 PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC. and COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”) submits this Further Case Management Conference Statement and Request for Continuance of Further Case Management Conference. National Union states as follows: 1. On August 31, 2012, the Court issued an Order staying this case pending disposition of a motion by National Union to stay the related Kansas Action between the parties. The Court set a further case management conference for December 14, 2012. Page 1 PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CMC STATEMENT & REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AM 18171973.1 1 2. On December 11, 2012, with the motion in the Kansas Action still undecided, 2 the Court issued an Order continuing the case management conference in this action until 3 February 14, 2013, to allow for disposition of the motion in the Kansas Action. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3. On January 4, 2013, the Court in the Kansas Action issued a Memorandum and Order granting summary judgment in favor of National Union. 4. Today, the clerk in the Kansas Action entered a “Judgment in a Civil Case” dismissing the Kansas Action in its entirety, which renders this action moot. 5. Upon the expiration of the applicable appeal period, National Union intends to dismiss this action with prejudice. 6. Accordingly, in the interests of judicial economy, National Union hereby 11 requests that the Court continue the further case management conference, currently set for 12 Thursday, February 14, 2013, forty-five (45) days, to allow for the anticipated dismissal of 13 this action. 14 Respectfully submitted, 15 Dated: February 7, 2013 /s/ Clinton J. McCord Clinton J. McCord EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP 9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 16 17 18 19 Stephen M. Prignano EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP 2800 Financial Plaza Providence, RI 02903 20 21 22 Counsel for Plaintiff 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CMC STATEMENT & REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AM 18171973.1 1 2 ORDER 3 The above request for continuance of further case management conference is 4 5 approved. The further CMC currently set for Thursday, February 14, 2013, is hereby 4/11 vacated, and reset to ________________________, 2013, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th 6 Floor. If a stipulation of dismissal is filed prior to that date, the further CMC will be vacated 7 and no appearances will be necessary. 8 9 Dated: A NO 2/12/13 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 11 S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 10 en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg HONORABLE EDWARDD CHEN RE M. 12 ORDE I S MOD RT 15 ER 17 A H 16 FO 14 LI 13 R NIA UNITED SO DISTRICT JUDGE IT IS STATES FIED N D IS T IC T R OF C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER CMC STATEMENT & REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AM 18171973.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?