National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc. et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., 14 15 Case No. CV-11-01892-EMC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, vs. 16 17 PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC. and COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and Defendants Collective Brands, Inc. and Payless Shoe Source, Inc. hereby stipulate and agree to the 22 23 24 dismissal of the above-captioned matter with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, in connection with this litigation. 25 26 27 28 Page 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AM 18069007.1 1 2 Dated: March 13, 2013 /s/ Clinton J. McCord Barry Leigh Weissman Clinton J. McCord EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP 9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 3 4 5 6 Stephen M. Prignano EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP 2800 Financial Plaza Providence, RI 02903 7 8 9 Counsel for plaintiff 10 11 Dated: March 13, 2013 Robert A. Sacks SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA 90067 13 14 15 16 Sverker K. Hogberg SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 17 18 19 Mark F. Rosenberg SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 20 21 S UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 ________________ n Edward M. Chen M. Che Edward U.S. District Court Judge RT ER H 28 AM 18069007.1 LI NO 27 D RDERE A 26 OO IT IS S RT U O 23 S DISTRICT Counsel for defendants TE C A T R NIA 22 24 /s/ Mark Rosenberg FO 12 C Page 2 OF D IS T IC T R STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE N

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?