National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc. et al
Filing
85
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
NATIONAL UNION FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF
PITTSBURGH, PA.,
14
15
Case No. CV-11-01892-EMC
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
vs.
16
17
PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE, INC. and
COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and Defendants
Collective Brands, Inc. and Payless Shoe Source, Inc. hereby stipulate and agree to the
22
23
24
dismissal of the above-captioned matter with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs
and expenses, including attorney’s fees, in connection with this litigation.
25
26
27
28
Page 1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
AM 18069007.1
1
2
Dated: March 13, 2013
/s/ Clinton J. McCord
Barry Leigh Weissman
Clinton J. McCord
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
3
4
5
6
Stephen M. Prignano
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
2800 Financial Plaza
Providence, RI 02903
7
8
9
Counsel for plaintiff
10
11
Dated: March 13, 2013
Robert A. Sacks
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1888 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067
13
14
15
16
Sverker K. Hogberg
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
17
18
19
Mark F. Rosenberg
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
20
21
S
UNIT
ED
IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
________________
n
Edward M. Chen
M. Che
Edward
U.S. District Court Judge
RT
ER
H
28
AM 18069007.1
LI
NO
27
D
RDERE
A
26
OO
IT IS S
RT
U
O
23
S DISTRICT
Counsel for defendants
TE
C
A
T
R NIA
22
24
/s/ Mark Rosenberg
FO
12
C
Page 2
OF
D IS T IC T
R
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
N
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?