Genentech, Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
Filing
174
ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 .
SAN FRACISCO DIVISION
11 GENENTECH, INC. and
ROCHE PALO ALTO, LLC,
Case No. 3:11-cv-01925-JSW (LB)
Related Case NO.3: ll-cv-0241O-JSW
12
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
13
(PROPOSED) ORDER VACATING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION ORDER
v.
Ctrm: 11, 19th Floor
14
SANDOZ, INC.
Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White
15
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01925-JSW (LB)
1 Pursuant to a stipulation entered into between Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto
2 LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Sandoz Inc. ("Defendant") and for good cause shown
Teamsters,
3 under the equitable factors identified in Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of
4 686 F.2d 720 (9th Cir. 1982), including '''the consequences and attendant hardships of dismissal or
5 refusal to dismiss' and 'the competing values of
finality of
judgment and right to relitigation of
6 unreviewed disputes,'" id. at 722, it is hereby
7 ORDERED, that good cause exists for vacatur ofthe Claim Construction Order (ECF No. 86) in
8 light of
the Ringsby factors; it is further
exclusively as it relates to case no. 11-1925 JSW
9 ORDERED, that the Claim Construction Order (ECF No. 86) in this action is hereby VACATED;
^
10 and it is further
11 ORDERED, that all future dates entered in this action are hereby vacated.
January 2014.
3rd
12 DONE and ORDERED in Chambers this _ day of
December 2013.
13
14
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
(PROPOSED) ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01925-JSW (LB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?