Genentech, Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.

Filing 174

ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 . SAN FRACISCO DIVISION 11 GENENTECH, INC. and ROCHE PALO ALTO, LLC, Case No. 3:11-cv-01925-JSW (LB) Related Case NO.3: ll-cv-0241O-JSW 12 Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, 13 (PROPOSED) ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER v. Ctrm: 11, 19th Floor 14 SANDOZ, INC. Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White 15 Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (PROPOSED) ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01925-JSW (LB) 1 Pursuant to a stipulation entered into between Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto 2 LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Sandoz Inc. ("Defendant") and for good cause shown Teamsters, 3 under the equitable factors identified in Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of 4 686 F.2d 720 (9th Cir. 1982), including '''the consequences and attendant hardships of dismissal or 5 refusal to dismiss' and 'the competing values of finality of judgment and right to relitigation of 6 unreviewed disputes,'" id. at 722, it is hereby 7 ORDERED, that good cause exists for vacatur ofthe Claim Construction Order (ECF No. 86) in 8 light of the Ringsby factors; it is further exclusively as it relates to case no. 11-1925 JSW 9 ORDERED, that the Claim Construction Order (ECF No. 86) in this action is hereby VACATED; ^ 10 and it is further 11 ORDERED, that all future dates entered in this action are hereby vacated. January 2014. 3rd 12 DONE and ORDERED in Chambers this _ day of December 2013. 13 14 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 (PROPOSED) ORDER VACATING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER CASE NO. 3:11-CV-01925-JSW (LB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?