Chang v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB et al

Filing 39

ORDER Dismissing Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 12/8/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011)

Download PDF
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 1 Leigh O. Curran (# 173322) lcurran@afrct.com 2 ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN, CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP 3 199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena, California 91101-2459 4 Telephone: (626) 535-1900 Facsimile: (626) 577-7764 5 Attorneys for Defendant Wachovia Mortgage, a 6 division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a 7 Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (sued as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB and 8 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) (“Wells Fargo”) 9 Robert P. Gates (# 45210) ERSKINE & TULLEY 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 315 11 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 392-5431 12 Facsimile: (415) 392-1978 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 19 CASE NO.: 3:11-CV-01951-SC The Honorable Samuel Conti CYNTHIA M. CHANG, 18 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, AND FIFTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF v. 20 WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, a national 21 association; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national association; and DOES 1 through 50, 22 inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 D CASE NO.: 3:11-CV-01951-SC ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS 1 Based on the stipulation entered into by and between plaintiff Cynthia Chang and defendant 2 Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, successor by merger to Wells Fargo 3 Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (sued as 4 Wachovia Mortgage, FSB and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) (“Wells Fargo”) through their counsel of 5 record, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED: 6 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), the second claim for fraud, misrepresentation, and 7 reckless disregard and fourth claim for violation of California Business and Professions Code 9 2. Wells Fargo shall file and serve its answer to the First Amended Complaint on or 10 before December 22, 2011. 11 UNIT ED S 12/8/11 RT U O RED 14 RT 15 onti amuel C Judge S FO 13 A H ER 16 R NIA E HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI O ORD IT IS S SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE LI 12 DATED: S DISTRICT TE C TA NO A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 8 Section 17200 are dismissed with prejudice. N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 D CASE NO.: 3:11-CV-01951-SC ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, 3 Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. 4 On December 8, 2011, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 5 ORDER DISMISSING SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, AND FIFTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF 6 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 7 Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System 8 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 2 Robert P. Gates Erskine & Tulley, A Professional Corporation 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 315 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 392-5431 Fax: (415) 392-1978 Email: attgates@pacbell.net Attorneys for Plaintiff Cynthia Chang 9 10 11 12 13 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of 15 this Court, at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, 16 California on December 8, 2011. 17 18 Kimberly Wooten (Type or Print Name) /s/ Kimberly Wooten (Signature of Declarant) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-01951-SC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?