Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Northern Pacific Drywall, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER Approving Satisfaction of Judgment. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 01/18/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01962-JSW Document16 Filed12/10/12 Page1 of 3 1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com 5 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 NORTHERN PACIFIC DRYWALL, INC., a 14 California Corporation, and DARRIN MICHAEL SPANN, an individual, 15 Defendants. 16 17 1. Case No.: C11-01962 JSW ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER THEREON (Docket Nos. 16 and 17) The undersigned hereby acknowledges that the Judgment in the above-captioned 18 action has been satisfied in full. 19 2. The names and address of the judgment creditors are: The Bay Area Painters And 20 Tapers Pension Trust Fund, et al., c/o Saltzman & Johnson Law Corporation, 44 Montgomery 21 Street, Suite 2110, San Francisco, California 94104. 22 3. 23 The names and addresses of the judgment debtors are as follows: (a) Northern Pacific Drywall, Inc., 1535 Farmers Lane #302, Santa Rosa, CA (b) Darrin Michael Spann, 2614 Magowan Drive, Santa Rosa, CA 94505. 24 95405; 25 26 4. The Amended Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation was entered on February 21, 2012. 27 5. An Abstract of Judgment was recorded as follows: Sonoma County, California, on 28 June 7, 2011, as instrument number 2011048557 P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Northern Pacific Drywall\Pleadings\C11-01962 JSW - Satisfaction of Judgment - 121012.doc -1PROOF OF SERVICE Case No.: C11-01962 JSW Case3:11-cv-01962-JSW Document16 Filed12/10/12 Page2 of 3 1 6. An Amended Abstract of Judgment was recorded as follows: Sonoma County, 2 California, on March 7, 2012, as instrument number 2012022326. 3 NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR: If this is an acknowledgment of full satisfaction of judgment, it must be recorded in the counties shown in Items 5-6 above, in order to release the judgment 4 lien. 5 Dated: December 10, 2012 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 6 7 By: 8 9 10 /S/ MICHELE R. STAFFORD Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Bay Area Painters & Tapers Trust Funds NOTARIZATION 11 12 13 State of California County of San Francisco ) ) ) 14 On December 10, 2012, before me, Vanessa de Fabrega, Notary Public, personally appeared MICHELE R. STAFFORD, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the 15 person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument the 16 person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. 17 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the 18 foregoing paragraph is true and correct. 19 WITNESS my hand and official seal. 20 ________________/S/________________ Notary's Signature 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the calendar in this matter is vacated, and that the Court shall Int the future, counsel should include a notation that a proposed order retain jurisdiction over this matter. is included with any such filing. By this Order, the Court grants the 25 request to expedite the ruling at docket no. 17. 26 Dated: _________________, 2012 January 18, 2013 27 24 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Northern Pacific Drywall\Pleadings\C11-01962 JSW - Satisfaction of Judgment - 121012.doc -2PROOF OF SERVICE Case No.: C11-01962 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?