Oyster Incorporated et al v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 21 Stipulation re (1) Voluntary Dismissal of Southern Counties Oil and (2) Filing of Answer to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/25/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)

Case3:11-cv-01969-JSW Document21-1

Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

OYSTER INCORPORATED, a California
corporation; EDWARDS & ANDERSON, INC.
a California corporation; AMSIA
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a California
corporation; HASSAN EGHDAMI, an
individual; JOSEPH FAZIO, an individual;
HAMPTON'S SERVICE, INC., a California
corporation; CBK INC., a California corporation;
JONTS GASMART, INC., a California
corporation; PREMIUM AUTO-TECH INC., a
California corporation; JAMES LIN, an
individual; HUNG TRINH, an individual; VTH
RESOURCES, INC., a California corporation;
WILL Y. WONG, an individual; and SD TEK

18
INC., a California corporation,

Case No. CV 11-01969 JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: (1)
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT SOUTHERN
COUNTIES OIL CO.; AND (2) FILING
OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: March 21, 2011
Courtroom: 11
Judge:
Jeffrey S. White
Trial Date: August 13, 2012

19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23
24

EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, SOUTHERN
COUNTIES OIL CO., a California Limited
Partnership, and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,
Defendants.

25
26

Whereas the parties to this action have submitted a Stipulation, agreeing as follows:

27
28
1
Case No. CV 11-01969 JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case3:11-cv-01969-JSW Document21-1

1
2

1.

Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 2

Plaintiffs’ claims in this action against Defendant Southern Counties Oil Co. shall be

dismissed in their entirety without prejudice as against Southern Counties Oil Co. only; and

3

2.

Defendant Equilon Enterprises LLC, dba Shell Oil Products US’s Answer to

4

Plaintiffs’ Complaint, dated April 20, 2011, currently on file with this Court, shall be deemed its

5

timely-filed Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

Dated:

August 25, 2011

_________________________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. CV 11-01969 JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT