Oyster Incorporated et al v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 21 Stipulation re (1) Voluntary Dismissal of Southern Counties Oil and (2) Filing of Answer to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/25/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01969-JSW Document21-1 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 OYSTER INCORPORATED, a California corporation; EDWARDS & ANDERSON, INC. a California corporation; AMSIA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation; HASSAN EGHDAMI, an individual; JOSEPH FAZIO, an individual; HAMPTON'S SERVICE, INC., a California corporation; CBK INC., a California corporation; JONTS GASMART, INC., a California corporation; PREMIUM AUTO-TECH INC., a California corporation; JAMES LIN, an individual; HUNG TRINH, an individual; VTH RESOURCES, INC., a California corporation; WILL Y. WONG, an individual; and SD TEK 18 INC., a California corporation, Case No. CV 11-01969 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: (1) VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO.; AND (2) FILING OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: March 21, 2011 Courtroom: 11 Judge: Jeffrey S. White Trial Date: August 13, 2012 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO., a California Limited Partnership, and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants. 25 26 Whereas the parties to this action have submitted a Stipulation, agreeing as follows: 27 28 1 Case No. CV 11-01969 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case3:11-cv-01969-JSW Document21-1 1 2 1. Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 2 Plaintiffs’ claims in this action against Defendant Southern Counties Oil Co. shall be dismissed in their entirety without prejudice as against Southern Counties Oil Co. only; and 3 2. Defendant Equilon Enterprises LLC, dba Shell Oil Products US’s Answer to 4 Plaintiffs’ Complaint, dated April 20, 2011, currently on file with this Court, shall be deemed its 5 timely-filed Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: August 25, 2011 _________________________________________ HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. CV 11-01969 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?