Portcullis Computer Security Ltd et al v. Portcullis Systems, Inc.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO VENUE AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/1/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2011)
Filed07/29/11 Page1 of 2
1 Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109)
2 Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344)
3 THE CRONE LAW GROUP
101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2650
4 San Francisco, CA 94104
5 Telephone: (415) 955-8900
Facsimile: (415) 955-8910
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11 PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD.,
a United Kingdom Corporation, PORTCULLIS
12 INC., a Delaware Corporation,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO
VENUE AND PERSONAL
JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT
Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS)
15 PORTCULLIS SYSTEMS INC., a
The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, have entered into a stipulation
20 (the “Stipulation”) on the terms that follow and request that the Court enter an order embracing the
21 terms of the Stipulation.
To facilitate settlement discussions and a potential resolution of this matter, the parties have
23 agreed that Defendant may have an extension of time up to and including October 3, 2011 to
24 answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.
One previous time modification has been implemented by request of the parties. On July
26 20, 2011, Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted an unopposed
27 motion for an extension of time to meet the deadlines set forth in the Court’s April 25, 2011 Order
28 Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (“Case Management Order”), and
-1STIP TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Filed07/29/11 Page2 of 2
1 to reset the Case Management Conference. On July 21, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiffs’
2 unopposed motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order.
The parties have further stipulated to venue in the United States District Court for the
4 Northern District of California for this dispute. Further, Defendant has agreed to submit to the
5 personal jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of this action. According, the parties waive any
6 objection to venue in this Court or this Court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over them for
7 purposes of this action.
I hereby attest that I have on file at The Crone Law Group a copy of any signatures
9 indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
Dated: July 29, 2011
JAIME J. SANTOS
THE CRONE LAW GROUP
By: /s/ Jaime J. Santos
Jaime J. Santos
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Portcullis Computer Security Limited and
Dated: July 29, 2009
WILLIAM E. HILTON
GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP
By: /s/ William E. Hilton
William E. Hilton
Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis
Based on to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the terms of the
Dated: __________________, 2011
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Honorable Joseph C. Spero
United States Magistrate Judge
24 Stipulation shall become the order of this Court.
D IS T IC T O
-2STIP TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?