Portcullis Computer Security Ltd et al v. Portcullis Systems, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO VENUE AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/4/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

1 Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109)
[e-mail]
2 Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344)
[e-mail]
3 THE CRONE LAW GROUP
101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2650
4 San Francisco, CA 94104
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD.,
a United Kingdom Corporation, PORTCULLIS
12 INC., a Delaware Corporation,
13

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO
VENUE AND PERSONAL
JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT

Plaintiffs,

14

Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS)

vs.

15 PORTCULLIS SYSTEMS INC., a
Massachusetts Corporation,
16
Defendant.
17
18

The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, have entered into a stipulation

19

20 (the “Stipulation”) on the terms that follow and request that the Court enter an order embracing the
21 terms of the Stipulation.
22 1.

To facilitate settlement discussions and a potential resolution of this matter, the parties have

23 agreed that Defendant may have an extension of time up to and including November 2, 2011 to
24 answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.
25 2.

Two previous time modifications have been implemented by request of the parties. On July

26 20, 2011, Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted an unopposed
27 motion for an extension of time to meet the deadlines set forth in the Court’s April 25, 2011 Order
28 Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (“Case Management Order”), and
-1STIP TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 to reset the Case Management Conference. On July 21, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiffs’
2 unopposed motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order. On July 29,
3 2011 Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted a proposed
4 stipulation to continue date for filing responsive pleadings. On August 1, 2011, the Court signed
5 the order granting the stipulated continuance.
6

I hereby attest that I have on file at The Crone Law Group a copy of any signatures

7 indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
8
Dated: October 3, 2011

JAIME J. SANTOS
THE CRONE LAW GROUP

9
10
11

By: /s/ Jaime J. Santos
Jaime J. Santos
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Portcullis Computer Security Limited and
Portcullis Inc.

12
13
14
Dated: October 3, 2011

WILLIAM E. HILTON
GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP

15
16
17

By: /s/ William E. Hilton
William E. Hilton
Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis
Systems Inc.

18
19

ORDER
20
Based on to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the terms of the

22 Stipulation shall become the order of this Court.

October 4
Dated: __________________, 2011

UNIT
ED
NO

RT

26

Jud

ER

A

H

27

R NIA

______________________________________
Honorable Joseph C. Spero
ero
United States pMagistrate Judge
h C. Sp
ge Jose

25

FO

24

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

23

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

LI

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
-2STIP TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT