Portcullis Computer Security Ltd et al v. Portcullis Systems, Inc.

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIP TO VENUE AND PERSONAL JURIS. OF THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/4/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109) mcoffino@cronelaw.com 2 Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344) jsantos@cronelaw.com 3 THE CRONE LAW GROUP 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2650 4 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Telephone: (415) 955-8900 Facsimile: (415) 955-8910 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD., a United Kingdom Corporation, PORTCULLIS 12 INC., a Delaware Corporation, 13 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 PORTCULLIS SYSTEMS INC., a Massachusetts Corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO VENUE AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, have entered into a stipulation 19 (the “Stipulation”) on the terms that follow and request that the Court enter an order embracing the 20 terms of the Stipulation. 21 1. The parties are currently involved in settlement discussions, which may provide resolution 22 of this matter, and have agreed that Defendant may have an extension of time up to and including 23 December 2, 2011 to answer, or otherwise respond, to the First Amended Complaint. 24 2. Three previous time modifications have been implemented by request of the parties. On 25 July 20, 2011, Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted an 26 unopposed motion for an extension of time to meet the deadlines set forth in the Court’s April 25, 27 2011 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (“Case Management 28 Order”), and to reset the Case Management Conference. On July 21, 2011, the Court granted -1THIRD STIP TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order. On 2 July 29, 2011 Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted a proposed 3 stipulation to continue the date for filing responsive pleadings. On August 1, 2011, the Court 4 signed the order granting the stipulated continuance. On October 3, 2011 Plaintiffs, Portcullis 5 Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted a proposed stipulation to continue date for 6 filing responsive pleadings. On October 4, 2011, the Court signed the order granting the stipulated 7 continuance. 8 I hereby attest that I have on file at The Crone Law Group a copy of any signatures 9 indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 10 Dated: November 2, 2011 JAIME J. SANTOS THE CRONE LAW GROUP 11 12 13 By: /s/ Jaime J. Santos Jaime J. Santos Attorneys for Plaintiffs Portcullis Computer Security Limited and Portcullis Inc. 14 15 16 Dated: November 2, 2011 WILLIAM E. HILTON GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP 17 18 19 By: /s/ William E. Hilton William E. Hilton Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis Systems Inc. 20 21 ORDER 22 Based on to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the terms of the 24 Stipulation shall become the order of this Court. S November 4 Dated: __________________, 2011 R NIA UNIT ED ______________________________________ Honorableseph C. SperC. Spero Joseph o Judge Jo United States Magistrate Judge RT ER H 28 FO NO 27 LI 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T -2- A 23 N F D IS T IC T O R C THIRD STIP TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?