Garcia et al v. Bana et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING 39 Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing Plaintiffs' Motions 37 to Consolidate and 38 for a Protective Order. The court will hear Plaintiffs' motions to consolidate and for a protective order along with Defendants' motion for a sanction of dismissal on June 7, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/25/2012.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco
NOE SOLIS GARCIA, et al.,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

Plaintiffs,

13
14

v.
MARIO BANA, et al.,

15

No. C 11-02047 LB
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO
CONSOLIDATE AND FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants.
[ECF No. 39]

16
17

_____________________________________/
In this action, there are three substantive motions currently pending before the court: (1)

18

Defendants’ motion for a sanction of dismissal (ECF No. 31); (2) Plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate

19

this action with another one (Poor v. Bana, et al., No. C12-02206 LB) (ECF No. 37); and (3)

20

Plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order (ECF No. 38). Defendants’ motion is set to be heard on

21

June 7, 2012, while Plaintiffs’ motions are set to be heard on June 21, 2012.

22

Because the matters underlying the three substantive motions are related, Plaintiffs filed an

23

administrative motion to move the hearing on their motions from June 21, 2012 to June 7, 2012.

24

Administrative Motion, ECF No. 39.1 Defendants did not file an opposition.

25

Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ administrative motion. The court will hear

26
27
28

1

Plaintiffs’ counsel did not include a proposed order with Plaintiffs’ administrative motion.
See Administrative Motion, ECF No. 39. Failure to include a proposed order with an administrative
motion violates this district’s civil local rules. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-11(a).
C 11-02047
ORDER

1

Plaintiffs’ motions to consolidate and for a protective order along with Defendants’ motion for a

2

sanction of dismissal on June 7, 2012. The court also hereby informs Plaintiffs’ counsel that his

3

personal appearance at the June 7, 2012 is expected and that no requests for telephonic appearance

4

will be granted.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 25, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 11-02047
ORDER

2