Milyakov et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
77
ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME by Judge Alsup striking 74 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 75 Motion to Shorten Time (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
EMIL P. MILYAKOV and MAGDALENA A.
APOSTOLOVA,,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 11-02066 WHA
ORDER STRIKING MOTION
TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS
MOOT MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., HSBC BANK
USA, NA, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE
CO., PAUL FINANCIAL, LLC, MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC. (MERS), FOUNDATION
CONVEYANCING, LLC, and DOES 1
through 100,
Defendants.
19
/
20
Pro se plaintiffs Emil Milyakov and Magdalena Apostolova have filed a motion to dismiss
21
and a motion to shorten time for the motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss on
22
November 17, 2011, and noticed it for hearing on December 1, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local
23
Rule 7-2, “all motions must be filed, served and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the
24
assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the motion.” Plaintiffs have
25
failed to comply with Rule 7-2. Their motion to dismiss is hereby STRICKEN.
26
27
28
Plaintiffs have also filed a motion to shorten time for the motion to dismiss pursuant to
1
Local Rules 6-1 and 6-3, without submitting the required declaration. As plaintiffs’ motion to
2
dismiss has been stricken, the motion to shorten time is DENIED AS MOOT.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: November 21, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?