CNA Insurance Company v. The Coca-Cola Company

Filing 11

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION THAT BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED AND CONSOLIDATED SHOULD BE GRANTED. The following cases are related and consolidated: Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola Co., CV 11-2042; Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola, CV 11-2424; CNA Ins. Co. v. Coca-Cola Cola, CV 11-2075; Alemu v. Coca-Cola Co., CV 11-2323. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 23, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 (San Francisco Division) 5 6 7 FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 8 Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 11 12 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY and DOES 1-50, Defendants. 13 ______________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C11-02042 MMC ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION THAT BCI COCACOLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED AND CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 42(a) AND LOCAL RULE 3-12 SHOULD BE GRANTED 14 15 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their 17 respective attorneys of record herein, that Defendant BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING 18 COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES’ administrative motion to consider whether cases should be 19 related and consolidated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 42(a) and Local Rule 20 3-12 should be granted. The parties hereby stipulate that the following cases should be deemed 21 related and reassigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney: 22 23 24 25 26 Earliest Filed Case/ Highest case number: First Related Case/ Lowest case number: Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola Co. Case number: CV 11-02042 MMC Second Related Case: CNA Ins. Co. v. Coca-Cola Co. Case Number: CV 11-02075 SBA Third Related Case: Abai Alemu v. Coca-Cola Co. Case Number: CV 11-02323 WHA 27 28 Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola Co. Case number: CV 11-02424 PJH FARMERS v. COCA-COLA, ET AL. CASE NO.: C11-02042 MMC 1 SO STIPULATED. 2 ALPER & McCULLOCH 3 DATED: June 23, 2011 By: 4 5 /S/ DEAN ALPER DEAN ALPER Attorneys for Plaintiff FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE 6 7 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. 8 DATED: June 23, 2011 /S/ ANNA M. MARTIN ANNA M. MARTIN Attorney for Defendants BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES (improperly sued herein as THE COCA-COLA COMPANY) By: 9 10 11 12 COZEN O’CONNOR 13 14 DATED: June 23, 2011 By: 15 /S/ DAVID BRISCO DAVID BRISCO Attorneys for Plaintiff CNA INSURANCE COMPANY 16 17 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER 18 19 DATED: June 23, 2011 By: 20 21 /S/ ERIC S. WONG ERIC S. WONG Attorneys for Defendant TRUE MANUFACTURING 22 LIBERSON & WOLFORD LLP 23 24 DATED: June 23, 2011 25 26 By: /S/ JASON N. LIBERSON JASON LIBERSON Attorneys for Plaintiffs ABAI ALEMU and ZAFU BELETE 27 28 2 FARMERS v. COCA-COLA, ET AL. CASE NO.: C11-02042 MMC 1 IT IS SO ORDERED: Specifically, the above-referenced four cases are related and 2 consolidated. In connection with the Initial Case Management Conference, the parties shall 3 include in their Joint Case Management Statement a proposal for the filing of documents in said 4 cases. 5 6 DATED: June 23, 2011 7 ______________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 FARMERS v. COCA-COLA, ET AL. CASE NO.: C11-02042 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?