CNA Insurance Company v. The Coca-Cola Company
Filing
11
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION THAT BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED AND CONSOLIDATED SHOULD BE GRANTED. The following cases are related and consolidated: Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola Co., CV 11-2042; Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola, CV 11-2424; CNA Ins. Co. v. Coca-Cola Cola, CV 11-2075; Alemu v. Coca-Cola Co., CV 11-2323. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 23, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
(San Francisco Division)
5
6
7
FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,
8
Plaintiff,
9
vs.
10
11
12
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY and
DOES 1-50,
Defendants.
13
______________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C11-02042 MMC
ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION THAT BCI COCACOLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF
LOS ANGELES’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES
SHOULD BE RELATED AND
CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO
FRCP RULE 42(a) AND LOCAL
RULE 3-12 SHOULD BE GRANTED
14
15
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their
17
respective attorneys of record herein, that Defendant BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING
18
COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES’ administrative motion to consider whether cases should be
19
related and consolidated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 42(a) and Local Rule
20
3-12 should be granted. The parties hereby stipulate that the following cases should be deemed
21
related and reassigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney:
22
23
24
25
26
Earliest Filed Case/
Highest case number:
First Related Case/
Lowest case number:
Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola Co.
Case number: CV 11-02042 MMC
Second Related Case:
CNA Ins. Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
Case Number: CV 11-02075 SBA
Third Related Case:
Abai Alemu v. Coca-Cola Co.
Case Number: CV 11-02323 WHA
27
28
Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Coca-Cola Co.
Case number: CV 11-02424 PJH
FARMERS v. COCA-COLA, ET AL.
CASE NO.: C11-02042 MMC
1
SO STIPULATED.
2
ALPER & McCULLOCH
3
DATED: June 23, 2011
By:
4
5
/S/ DEAN ALPER
DEAN ALPER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE
6
7
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
8
DATED: June 23, 2011
/S/ ANNA M. MARTIN
ANNA M. MARTIN
Attorney for Defendants
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF
LOS ANGELES (improperly sued herein as THE
COCA-COLA COMPANY)
By:
9
10
11
12
COZEN O’CONNOR
13
14
DATED: June 23, 2011
By:
15
/S/ DAVID BRISCO
DAVID BRISCO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CNA INSURANCE COMPANY
16
17
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN
& DICKER
18
19
DATED: June 23, 2011
By:
20
21
/S/ ERIC S. WONG
ERIC S. WONG
Attorneys for Defendant
TRUE MANUFACTURING
22
LIBERSON & WOLFORD LLP
23
24
DATED: June 23, 2011
25
26
By:
/S/ JASON N. LIBERSON
JASON LIBERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ABAI ALEMU and ZAFU BELETE
27
28
2
FARMERS v. COCA-COLA, ET AL.
CASE NO.: C11-02042 MMC
1
IT IS SO ORDERED: Specifically, the above-referenced four cases are related and
2
consolidated. In connection with the Initial Case Management Conference, the parties shall
3
include in their Joint Case Management Statement a proposal for the filing of documents in said
4
cases.
5
6
DATED: June 23, 2011
7
______________________________
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
FARMERS v. COCA-COLA, ET AL.
CASE NO.: C11-02042 MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?