Hsu v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.

Filing 60

NOTICE RE PLAINTIFF'S DEADLINE TO OPPOSE 59 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/14/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 DARRU K. “KEN” HSU, individually and as a trustee of the DARRU K. HSU AND GINA T. HSU LIVING TRUST, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. C 11-02076 WHA NOTICE RE PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. / 17 18 Today, defense counsel filed a motion to extend time so that they may have until March 3 19 to oppose plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion. This comes after defense counsel admittedly missed their 20 February 13 deadline to file their opposition. 21 Under Civil Local Rule 6-3(b), plaintiff can oppose defendant’s present motion to extend 22 time. Plaintiff is not required to file such an opposition, but should he choose to do so, he should 23 take note that his opposition should be no more than five pages and is due by 5 PM ON 24 FEBRUARY 18, 2014. Only after that deadline has passed can the undersigned judge determine 25 defendant’s motion to extend time. See Rule 6-3(d). Defense counsel, however, should be 26 aware that it is unlikely that their request for an extension will be granted in its entirety. 27 28 Dated: February 14, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?