Hsu v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.

Filing 66

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 64 MOTION TO CORRECT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/19/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2014).

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

DARRU K. “KEN” HSU, individually and
as a trustee of the DARRU K. HSU AND
GINA T. HSU LIVING TRUST, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
MOTION TO CORRECT

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 11-02076 WHA

Today, plaintiff Darru K. “Ken” Hsu’s filed a motion to correct the February 19 order,

17

which granted in part and denied in part defendant’s motion to extend an opposition deadline

18

(Dkt. Nos. 63, 64). While plaintiff did state — in a motion for default judgment — that there are

19

“no justifiable reasons” or “truthful causes” for defense counsel missing their opposition

20

deadline, there were other reasons underlying the February 19 order. Indeed, that order already

21

agreed with plaintiff in finding that defense counsel had not shown good cause, but nonetheless

22

extended defendant’s opposition deadline to two days from now. As such, plaintiff’s motion to

23

correct the February 19 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The February 19 order will

24

be corrected, but only to the extent that the last sentence of that order’s first paragraph (at lines

25

21–22) is stricken.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 19, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE