Green Desert Oil Group Inc. et al v. BP West Coast Products LLC et al

Filing 65

ORDER re filing schedule for 2nd Amd Complaint re 63 Stipulation,, filed by Zhgoul Investment Group LLC, S & H Bros. Enterprises, Inc., Galena Gasoline, Inc., Tech LLC, Riverside County Travel Zone Center, Crossway Investments, Inc., Rana Enterpris es, Inc., Green Desert Oil Group Inc., Nazm, Inc., Naspat, Inc., Zghoul Stations Inc., JBI Investment Group, Inc., Mike's Marysville Mini Mart, Hammer/I-5 Investments, Inc., HF and SJ, Inc., GNC Properties, Inc., Hegenberger Holdings, Inc., Aitan, Inc., GI Krupa II Corp.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/14/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)

Case3:11-cv-02087-CRB Document63-1

Filed11/07/11 Page1 of 2

1 SEEGER WEISS LLP

Jonathan Shub (Bar No. 237708)
Christopher Seeger, pro hac vice
10960 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1910
3 Los Angeles, California 90024
Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]
4 Email: [e-mail]
2

5 LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC

James M. Lee (Bar No. 192301)
K. Luan Tran (Bar No. 193808)
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4025
7 Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]
8 Email: [e-mail], [e-mail]
6

9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 GREEN DESERT OIL GROUP INC.; JBI CASE NO. 3:11-cv-02087-CRB

INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.; NAZM,

13 INC.;NASPAT, INC.; HEGENBERGER
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

HOLDINGS, INC.; GNC PROPERTIES,
INC.; HF AND SJ, INC.; HAMMER/I-5
INVESTMENTS, INC.; MIKE’S
MARYSVILLE MINI MART; TECH
LLC; S & H BROS. ENTERPRISES,
INC.; RANA ENTERPRISES, INC.;
ZGHOUL STATIONS INC.; ZHGOUL
INVESTMENT GROUP LLC;
CROSSWAY INVESTMENTS, INC.; GI
KRUPA II CORP.; GALENA
GASOLINE, INC.
v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs,

21 BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company; BP

22 PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., a

Maryland corporation; RETALIX LTD, an

23 Israeli company; and DOES 1 through 10,
24
25

inclusive,

Defendants.

26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case3:11-cv-02087-CRB Document63-1

Filed11/07/11 Page2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

After considering Plaintiffs and Defendants' Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY

4 ORDERED that the following schedule is the Order of this Court:
5
6
7
8

 Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint 14 days after the
Court issues its final ruling on Retalix LTD.’s FRCP 12(b) motion;
 Defendants shall have 30 days to answer or otherwise respond to any
Second Amended Complaint

9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11

S

RT
U
O

ER

H

18

harle
Judge C

19

FO

RT

17

yer

s R. Bre

NO

16

LI

15

R NIA

HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE
UNITED STATES RDERED COURT
DISTRICT
IS SO O
IT

14

A

November 14, 2011
13 DATE:___________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
____________________________________
TA

UNIT
ED

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER