Rosenfeld v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 22

ORDER re 19 Unopposed Request for Order Extending Time filed by Seth Rosenfeld. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 12/15/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

4

Benjamin W. Stein, SBN 260074
LAW OFFICES OF BENJAMIN STEIN
221 Fairmount Ave. #4
Oakland, CA 94611
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: None
[e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

1
2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

SETH ROSENFELD

)

13

Plaintiff,

)

14
15
16

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ

)
vs.

)

UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN
ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND
[proposed] ORDER

)

18

FEDERAL BUREAU OF
)
INVESTIGATION and UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
)

19

Defendants.

17

)
)

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff SETH ROSENFELD files this UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR
ORDER EXTENDING TIME.

25
26
27
28

1

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [proposed]
ORDER

1

Whereas,

this

Court

on

December

2,

2011,

ORDER

CHANGING

TIME

granted

the

2

STIPULATED

3

extended the filing date SEVEN (7) days from the originally

4

scheduled filing date of December 1, 2011; and,

5

REQUEST

Whereas,

in

FOR

filing

the

STIPULATED

(“motion”),

REQUEST

FOR

which

ORDER

6

CHANGING TIME dated November 30, 2011, which the Court granted,

7

Plaintiff's counsel inadvertently calculated the date for the

8

reset motion as December 7, 2011, instead of December 8, 2011;

9

and

10

Whereas,

all

motions

in

this

case

have

been

due

on

11

Thursdays, and December 7 was a Wednesday only SIX (6) days

12

after the original filing date; and

13
14

Whereas Defendant’s counsel has stated by email that she
does not oppose this request; and

15

Whereas previously the parties agreed to extend the time of

16

the Case Management Conference, and the parties agreed to extend

17

the time for the motions for summary judgment; and

18

Whereas delaying the Motion for Summary Judgment by 1 day

19

from the date incorrectly calculated by Plaintiff’s counsel will

20

prejudice none of the parties, and will not affect any other

21
22
23
24
25

filing date in the action;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule (6-2), Plaintiff
counsel requests an unopposed extension of Plaintiff's CrossMotion for Summary Judgment and Opposition by 1 day, to be filed
by December 8, 2011.

26
27
28

2

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [proposed]
ORDER

1
2
3
4

DATED: December 8, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

5
6
7
8
9

By: _______/s/ Benjamin Stein_________
Benjamin W. Stein
Attorney for Plaintiff
SETH ROSENFELD

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [proposed]
ORDER

4

Benjamin W. Stein, SBN 260074
LAW OFFICES OF BENJAMIN STEIN
221 Fairmount Ave. #4
Oakland, CA 94611
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: None
[e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

1
2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

SETH ROSENFELD

)

13

Plaintiff,

)

14
15
16

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ

)
vs.

)

[proposed] ORDER

)

18

FEDERAL BUREAU OF
)
INVESTIGATION and UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
)

19

Defendants.

17

)
)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [proposed]
ORDER

1
Order

2
3

By request of Plaintiff counsel and unopposed by

4

Defendants' counsel and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS

5

HEREBY ORDERED;

6
7
8
9

Plaintiff's Cross Motion and Opposition scheduled for
December 7, 2011 is rescheduled for December 8,

2011.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Deceember 15
Dated ___________, 2011

14

______________________________

15

Chief Magistrate Judge

16

Maria-Elena James

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

5

Case No. 3:11-cv-02131-MEJ
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [proposed]
ORDER